SUGGESTION AND MANIPULATION: COMMUNICATIVE INFLUENCE TYPES’ COMMON AND DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS

Abstract

The article provides a theoretical review of suggestion and manipulation being the communicative influence types, including data on their specific characteristics and current classifications. The author attempted to differentiate these communicative influence types and isolate their particular features. The article is aimed at isolating the differential characteristics of suggestion and manipulation as the communicative influence types. The aim having been set defines the need to find a solution for the following specific tasks: considering the very concept of suggestion and manipulation; investigating the classification characteristics of suggestive and manipulative influence; isolating the differential characteristics of suggestion and manipulation. Communicative influence is the object of the article, while suggestion and manipulation as the communicative influence types are the subject. The author has utilized a wide variety of common, linguistic and psycholinguistic research methods. The descriptive method allowed to explain the nature of suggestive and manipulative influence, as well as their special features. Analysis and synthesis methods make it possible to unveil the elements of the analyzed phenomena, and unite them into an integral one. The aim of influence is the main differential feature for distinguishing such communicative influence types as suggestion and manipulation, and it could usually be defined from the view of the manipulator (subject), who gains one’s benefit causing damage to the object. All the other features might characterize the both communicative influence types. The further communicative influence research would significantly improve the information on its other types, as well as its realization ways and means.

Authors and Affiliations

N. V. Kutuza

Keywords

Related Articles

LEXICAL MEANS OF SPEECH INFLUENCE IN A SYNCRETIC GENRE OF POLITICAL CAMPAIGN DISCOURSE

The article presents the analysis of the language means of realization of suggestive impact in the promotional genres of the Ukrainian political discourse. Defines the basic lexical language resources and their potential...

DERIVATIVE PECULIARITIES OF ODESSA REGION’S DIALECT LEXIS

The article deals with the analysis of the dialect vocabulary of Odessa region from the point of view of its word-building peculiarities: the ways of forming of dialectisms and the peculiarity of using the word-building...

ETHNIC AUTHENTICATION OF MOVCYA IN PHRASEOLOGY UNITS EXCLAMATION OF PROSE MARIA MATIOS

This article explores exclamation phraseological units as verbalizatory ethnic identification hutsuls and Bukovina in prose Mary Matios. It is established that the structure of the phraseology reflected hutsuls religious...

THE ONOMASTICON PECULIARITES OF BROTHERS KAPRANOVS’ WORKS

The article analyzes the stylistic features of the onyms in the Brothers Kapranovs’ science fictional works, highlights their role in the literary rext. The purpose of our research is to make functional and stylistic ana...

UTILIZING UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE AS STATE ONE NOWADAYS

The article is aimed at reviewing the common Ukrainian legislative framework on the realization of the Ukrainian state language policy concerning the issues of utilizing the Ukrainian language as the state one at the pre...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP395832
  • DOI -
  • Views 84
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

N. V. Kutuza (2017). SUGGESTION AND MANIPULATION: COMMUNICATIVE INFLUENCE TYPES’ COMMON AND DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS. Записки з українського мовознавства, 2(24), 178-189. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-395832