Supervaluationism and the timeless solution to the foreknowledge problem

Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

If God knew I were going to write this paper, was I able to refrain from writing it this morning? One possible response to this question is that God's knowledge does not take place in time and therefore He does not properly fore-know. According to this response, God knows absolutely everything, it's just that He knows everything outside of time. The so-called timeless solution was one of the influential responses to the foreknowledge problem in classical Christian Theology. This solution, however, seemed to lose support in the recent debate. For example, Pike claims that "the doctrine of God's timelessness entered Christian Theology (only) because Platonic thought was stylish at the time" (Pike, 1970, 190) and Hasker (2001) catalogues this as one of the minor solutions to the problem. One possible source for this general attitude towards timelessness is the thought that the very idea of timelessness is incoherent. In this paper I argue that that the timeless solution to the foreknowledge problem is congenial with the supervaluationist theory of branching time and that this formal framework provides, in fact, a precise characterization of the timeless solution to the foreknowledge problem. The views presented in this paper are in line with those of Kretzmann and Stump (1981), Leftow (1991) and De Florio and Frigerio (2015).

Authors and Affiliations

Pablo Cobreros

Keywords

Related Articles

Why minds cannot be received, but are created by brains

There is no controversy in psychology or brain sciences that brains create mind and consciousness. Doubts and opinions to the contrary are quite frequently expressed in non-scientific publications. In particular the idea...

Suárez y quienes negaron el intelecto agente en el s. XVI

Suárez and who denied the agent intellect in s. XVI In this paper three theses on the agent intellect of various Renaissance writers are studied: a) those that deny the real distinction between one and another intellect...

What makes us human? Augustine on interiority, exteriority and the self

The composition of the human person is a central issue for Augustine. He addresses it in a philosophico-theological way; particularly in The Soliloquies and in The Confessions. What is at stake here is his exposition of...

La síntesis interna de la experiencia sensible. La psicología de Suárez y el origen de la neurociencia

In the context of the great philosophical synthesis of Francis Suárez, between XVI and XVII centuries, his commentary to De Anima manifest the originality of his thought, between continuity and innovation in front of the...

Oblicza religii Augusta Cieszkowskiego. Temporalny i dziejowy wymiar doświadczenia religijnego

Faces of Religion of August Cieszkowski. Temporal and Historical Dimension of Religious Experience August Cieszkowski is one of the greatest philosophers of Polish philosophy of nation and history. He was also a thinker...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP195110
  • DOI 10.12775/SetF.2016.015
  • Views 96
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Pablo Cobreros (2016). Supervaluationism and the timeless solution to the foreknowledge problem. Scientia et Fides, 4(1), 61-75. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-195110