Supervaluationism and the timeless solution to the foreknowledge problem
Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 1
Abstract
If God knew I were going to write this paper, was I able to refrain from writing it this morning? One possible response to this question is that God's knowledge does not take place in time and therefore He does not properly fore-know. According to this response, God knows absolutely everything, it's just that He knows everything outside of time. The so-called timeless solution was one of the influential responses to the foreknowledge problem in classical Christian Theology. This solution, however, seemed to lose support in the recent debate. For example, Pike claims that "the doctrine of God's timelessness entered Christian Theology (only) because Platonic thought was stylish at the time" (Pike, 1970, 190) and Hasker (2001) catalogues this as one of the minor solutions to the problem. One possible source for this general attitude towards timelessness is the thought that the very idea of timelessness is incoherent. In this paper I argue that that the timeless solution to the foreknowledge problem is congenial with the supervaluationist theory of branching time and that this formal framework provides, in fact, a precise characterization of the timeless solution to the foreknowledge problem. The views presented in this paper are in line with those of Kretzmann and Stump (1981), Leftow (1991) and De Florio and Frigerio (2015).
Authors and Affiliations
Pablo Cobreros
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP195110
- DOI 10.12775/SetF.2016.015
- Views 84
- Downloads 0
Suárez on Visual Perception
This paper surveys the main issues in Suárez’s theory of visual perception, which in its complexity and systematical ordering has not been explored yet. These questions, exposed in the first five questions of the seventh...
Supervaluationism and the timeless solution to the foreknowledge problem
If God knew I were going to write this paper, was I able to refrain from writing it this morning? One possible response to this question is that God's knowledge does not take place in time and therefore He does not prope...
Wiedza Boga o momencie śmierci człowieka w Epistola ad Bernardum Tomasza z Akwinu a opatrzność w tomizmie analitycznym
God’s Knowledge about moment of man’s death in Thomas Aquinas Epistola ad Bernardum and providence in analytical thomism The aim of the article is to present the most important statement in the last – dictated before hi...
Spór o możliwość wykrywania projektu w naukach przyrodniczych
Controversy over the possibility of detecting design in natural sciences According to intelligent design theory, certain biological and cosmic phenomena are designed by an intelligent being and this design is scientific...
Realismo y racionalidad científica: un viaje desde la lógica a la ética
Realism and scientific rationality: A journey from logic to ethics Mariano Artigas’s relationship with the work and person of Karl Popper went through three phases. The first one ends with Artigas’s book entitled Karl P...