SYMPHONIC CATEGORIES “SUBLIME” AND “BEAUTIFUL” IN THE BYZANTINETHEOLOGICAL AND AESTHETIC TRADITIONS: SEMANTIC ASPECT

Abstract

The article is devoted to the considering of the definition of categories of "sublime" and "beautiful". The basic features of the categories of "sublime" and "beautiful" as an extremely complex and have a large volume. The symphonicity of these categories is analyzed. The possibilities and the context of their use are shown. It is proved that the dialectical nature of the process of the unfolding of these concepts in the context of the aesthetic thought of Byzantium is due to the presence of elements similar to the principles of modern humanism are defined as principles that characterize symphonism as a special quality of thinking. The following universal characteristics of Byzantine culture are defined as symphonic and canon. A detailed explanation of the connection between the categories "sublime" and "beautiful" is given in the context ofthe Byzantine theological-aesthetic tradition. The article proves that the connection between the categories "sublime" and "beautiful" can and does occur within the framework of the Byzantine canon through their symphony, consonance in the context of the divine. It is determined that the transition from a literal understanding of a sign or symbol to metaphorical one requires an understanding of certain rules and conventions that arise in the course of this transition. It is especially important that the symphony, the harmony of the categories "beautiful" and "sublime", that being extremely voluminous in their content, at the same time make itpossible for the ordinary man to perceive complex symbolic systems. The common feature of the categories "beauty", "beautiful" and "sublime" within the aesthetics of Byzantium is not only the inclusion of the sign "value" (νόημα) as elements in the goal, but also their use. As an additional, intermediate link in the connection symbol(in the aesthetics of Byzantium it is more of an artistic symbol) - a person who is the central axis of the aesthetics of Byzantium.It is proved that the category in linguistics has linguisticmeanings that are interconnected because of the common semantic features, and they are such that represent a closed system of elements of these attributes. In our case, the categories "sublime" and "beautiful" include the entire spectrum of elements that we call when defining these concepts.

Authors and Affiliations

A. Matytsyn

Keywords

Related Articles

THE CULTURAL MISSION OF CLASSICAL UNIVERSITY

The article is devoted to the analysis of historical dynamics of university and its classification of cultural types. The main part of attention is concerned over the classical model of university and its transformations...

IDEOLOGICAL GROUNDS OF CULTURAL IDENTIFICATION OF THE CRIMEAN TATARS: FORMATION CONTEXTS

The article describes the current ideological grounds of the cultural identity of the Crimean Tatars; the historical and political contexts of their formation is studied, comparative analysis of the activity of the first...

INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE "CONTEMPORARY ART IN THE DIGITAL MEDIA / MASS MEDIA"

INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE "CONTEMPORARY ART IN THE DIGITAL MEDIA / MASS MEDIA"

RETHINKING THE ROLE OF TV SERIES: ENTERTAINING CONTENT, PROPAGANDA WAYS OR NEW MYTH

The article is an overview of the problem of TV series as a mass culture phenomenon. The purpose of the article is an attempt to rethink the role of television series in the modern socio-cultural sphere, determining thei...

SEMANTIC SHIFT FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE

The article is devoted to the analysis of the functional architecture signification mode. The distinction between functional architecture and symbolic one is determined on the basis of Hegelian approach. This shift gener...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP543694
  • DOI -
  • Views 154
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

A. Matytsyn (2017). SYMPHONIC CATEGORIES “SUBLIME” AND “BEAUTIFUL” IN THE BYZANTINETHEOLOGICAL AND AESTHETIC TRADITIONS: SEMANTIC ASPECT. УКРАЇНСЬКІ КУЛЬТУРОЛОГІЧНІ СТУДІЇ, 1(1), 30-34. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-543694