Systematic bias in epidemiological studies
Journal Title: Αρχεία Ελληνικής Ιατρικής - Year 2007, Vol 24, Issue 4
Abstract
Bias can creep into epidemiologic studies from many directions. Various types of specific bias have been described, but it is helpful to classify bias into three broad categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. Selection bias is a systematic bias in a study that stems from the procedures used to elect subjects and from factors that influence study participation. It comes about when the association between the determinant under study and the outcome differs for those who participate and those who do not participate in the study. There are two kinds of selection bias, volunteer bias (or self- election bias) and selection bias, often referred to as the “healthy worker effect”. Information bias can arise because the information collected about or from study subjects is erroneous. A simple definition of confounding would be the confusion, or mixing, of effects: this definition implies that the effect of the determinant under study is mixed with the effect of another variable (extraneous determinant), leading to a bias. Extraneous determinants are referred to as “potential confounders of the conditional relation of interest” because they are predictors of the occurrence of the outcome at issue. When extraneous determinants have different distributions among the compared categories of the determinant under study they constitute actual confounders. Confounding is a systematic error that investigators aim either to prevent or to remove from a study. In study design, there are two common methods to prevent confounding, randomization and restriction. A third method to prevent confounding is matching, which prevents confounding in studies with closed populations, but in case-control studies, surprisingly, does not. Two methods that can be used to deal with confounding in the analysis of data are stratification and regressionmodels.
Authors and Affiliations
P. Galanis, L. Sparos
Cost-effectiveness analysis for basic screening tests for swine flu in a pandemic
OBJECTIVE Currently, many screening tests for swine flu are available. A major concern is the cost-effectiveness of the test used. Here a basic costeffectiveness analysis is made of the available basic screening tests fo...
Acute aortic dissection
No abstract available
Non Hodgkin’s lymphoma of B-cell type MALT, progression to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
No abstract available
Obstructive sleep apnea as a risk factor for road traffic accidents
No abstract available
Stratified analysis of data
Stratified analysis or stratification is used to study and control for the effect of other than variables exposure and disease, in data analysis. Stratification means that the data are separated into categories or strat...