Systematic review and meta-analysis <br /> <br />
Journal Title: Αρχεία Ελληνικής Ιατρικής - Year 2009, Vol 26, Issue 6
Abstract
Systematic review and meta-analysis should be considered as two different interdependent procedures that aim to calculate a summary effect indicating the relationship between the determinant under study and the outcome. The basis of a systematic review is a comprehensive literature review to identify all the similar and relevant studies that satisfy a pre-defined set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The basic steps in a systematic review include (a) a clear statement of the scientific hypothesis to be tested, (b) a clearly defined statement of inclusion and exclusion criteria for admission of studies into the review, and (c) a methodology for locating studies that should be included in the meta-analysis. The end result of a systematic review is a list of studies each of which provides a weighted value for the calculation of the summary result. Meta-analysis is the mathematical process of combining the separate studies that have been chosen in the systematic review to produce one overall study and to calculate a summary effect. For example, if there are three separate studies, with 30, 50 and 100 participants, respectively, their combination would generate a total study with 180 participants. The assumption of the meta-analysis is that this combined study will provide a more reliable and precise overall result than any of the smaller individual studies. The basic steps in a meta- analysis include (a) estimation of publication bias, (b) estimation of heterogeneity among the studies, and (c) a mathematical process to combine the results of the separate studies. Estimation of publication bias is achieved with the funnel plot, the rank correlation coefficient (Kendall's or Spearman's) or the sensitivity analysis. L' Abbe plot and DerSimonian-Laird's Q test are used to estimate the heterogeneity among studies. The combined result of the meta- analysis and the results of the individual studies are displayed graphically using the forest plot. Systematic review and meta-analysis offer the best choice for researchers in making rational decisions about public health issues.
Authors and Affiliations
P. GALANIS
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP83374
- DOI -
- Views 88
- Downloads 0
Lung edema and thrombosis induced by activated mannose-binding lectinassociated serine protease 2 and MHC class I reactions, and liver thrombosis aggravated by suppressed phosphotyrosine and female donor reactions to male-specific antigens in Lewis rats
OBJECTIVE The causes of lung edema and thrombosis and liver embolism were investigated in rats. METHOD Lewis rats were used. Mannose-binding lectin (MBL)-associated serine protease 2 (MASP-2) antibody (Ab) was injecte...
Causality
The causality debate has centered on two issues, the metaphysical, and the epistemic. The metaphysical issue concerns the nature of the connection between cause and effect: how and in virtue of what does the cause bring...
Teaching of clinical skills: From simulation to real patients
Contemporary medical education waivers between providing integrated education and ensuring quality in healthcare services. Patient safety has become the main priority in medicine, causing serious problems and limitations...
The military hospital of Candia
In the late 16th century, in the Kingdom of Candia (present day Heraklion), a military hospital was founded within the health policy framework of the Republic of Venice. Until that time, the nursing and care of patients...
Infection by Rhodotorula in a patient with multiple myeloma and extramedullary plasmacytoma
Rhodotorula spp is a non-infectious fungus which is found in abundance in the environment but may become an opportunistic pathogen in patients with immunodeficiency. Patients with hematological malignancies are particula...