TEMPORAL PROCESSING IN MUSICIANS AND NON-MUSICIANS

Journal Title: Journal of Hearing Science - Year 2014, Vol 4, Issue 3

Abstract

Background: Temporal processing abilities are important for speech perception, and they are generally superior in musicians than in non-musicians. Since there are many different training methods used to develop musical expertise (e.g. vocal or instrumental), these differences could lead to varying temporal processing abilities of acoustic signals. The current study aims to see if there are any differences in temporal processing abilities between violinists and vocalists. Materials and methods: Four different psychoacoustic tests – gap detection threshold (GDT), duration discrimination test (DDT), duration pattern test (DPT), and the modulation detection threshold for sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noise (SAM) at six different modulation frequencies – were used to assess differences in temporal processing abilities between 15 trained violinists and 15 trained vocalists. The results were compared with a group of 15 non-musicians. Results: Musicians, both violinists and vocalists, always performed significantly better (p<0.01) than non-musicians in all 4 psychoacoustic tests. Vocalists performed equal to or slightly better than violinists in GDT and at 5/6 modulation frequencies in modulation detection threshold for SAM noise test, although the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Although vocalists and instrumentalists undergo different forms of training in terms of the sound they produce and the sound qualities they need to perceive, the training does not lead to any major difference in their temporal processing abilities of acoustic signals.

Authors and Affiliations

Priyanka Kumar, Baljeet Rana, Rajalakshmi Krishna

Keywords

Related Articles

TEMPORAL PROCESSING IN MUSICIANS AND NON-MUSICIANS

Background: Temporal processing abilities are important for speech perception, and they are generally superior in musicians than in non-musicians. Since there are many different training methods used to develop musical e...

OUTCOMES FOR PATIENTS WITH SLOPING HEARING LOSS GIVEN STANDARD COCHLEAR IMPLANTS

Background: This study examined the speech perception outcomes for postlingually deafened adults using cochlear implants who preoperatively had steeply sloping hearing loss and in whom there was no attempt at electroacou...

THE REMARKABLE FROG EAR: IMPLICATIONS FOR VERTEBRATE HEARING

Frogs, and related amphibians, are adapted to live in both air and water, and so good hearing in both mediums is required. The structure of the frog ear can therefore provide a useful perspective on how sound is sensed a...

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO SPEECH STIMULI IN CHILDREN WITH OTITIS MEDIA

Background: Otitis media in childhood may result in changes in auditory information processing and speech perception. Once a failure in decoding information has been detected, an evaluation can be performed by auditory e...

MISMATCH NEGATIVITY AND THE N2B COMPONENT ELICITED BY PURE TONES AND SPEECH SOUNDS IN ANOMIC APHASIA: A CASE STUDY

Background: The auditory processing impairments frequently observed in aphasia are being slowly clarified by using eventrelated potentials (ERPs), a method that allows brain processes to be observed at high temporal reso...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP169336
  • DOI -
  • Views 61
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Priyanka Kumar, Baljeet Rana, Rajalakshmi Krishna (2014). TEMPORAL PROCESSING IN MUSICIANS AND NON-MUSICIANS. Journal of Hearing Science, 4(3), 35-42. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-169336