Terror from the Jurisprudential Point of View

Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2011, Vol 43, Issue 87

Abstract

Terrorism is among the phenomena that has nowadays basically received the attention of political trends, media, and the researchers in the fields of politics, jurisprudence, and law. On the other hand, many of the distortions and unduly accusations made against Islam and the Muslims are related to this phenomenon. Thus, legal study of terrorism and its exploration from the viewpoint of jurisprudence seems necessary for providing an appropriate response to the onslaught of the enemies of Islam. This article, at first, addresses the semantics of the word terrorism in dictionaries of political sciences and re-examines the concepts synonym to it, such as: fatk (violent killing), ightiyāl (assassination), and irhāb (terror) in the earlier and modern literature and distinction of these concepts from each other as well as the words related to this discussion such as: baghy (injustice), muḥāriba (waging war), and jihād (holy war). In the section on legal study, while explaining the subject and the distinction of different kinds of terror, it examines different types of terror by the way of generic and specific proofs from the Qur’ānic verses and traditions. In the end, some of the propounded misconceptions are responded to and the jurists’ viewpoints about terror are touched upon.

Authors and Affiliations

AbdulkarīM AbdullāHī, RamaḍāN ‘AbbāSpūR Muqaddam

Keywords

Related Articles

A study of the rule ‘Unforgivable in continuity (survival, sustainability) is not unforgivable in the beginning’

In Islamic jurisprudence we face phrases such as ‘Unforgivable in continuity (survival, sustainability) is not unforgivable in the beginning’ whose context suggest that this is considered by scholars as a known and accep...

The Status of Ethical Parity of the Married Couple in Formation of Family in Jurisprudence and Statutory Law

One of the fundamental secrets of durability of the true religion of Islam is the moral-ness of its doctrines. Jurisprudence or Islamic law, which gives direction to the behavior of the compos mentis and their life skill...

Disputation of Traditionists with Legal Theoreticians over the Validity of External Meanings

According to the traditionists (akhbārīs), “inference of theoretical precepts from the external meanings of the Qur’ān and the sunna of the Prophet without reference to the Infallible Imams is not permitted. Also, after...

A Research into the Legal and Judicial Principles of the Executed Person Coming Back to Life

Article 438 of the Islamic penal law considers as renewable the sentence of the executed person coming back to life in case of qiṣāṣ (retaliated punishment) due to observance of the resemblance (mumāthilat) condition and...

Further Research on the Validity of Absolute Conjecture

The issue of validity and non-validity of absolute conjecture, although frequently studied and researched by great scholars, is still in need of further research, since the studies and researches carried out so far are t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP183253
  • DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.3936
  • Views 138
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

AbdulkarīM AbdullāHī, RamaḍāN ‘AbbāSpūR Muqaddam (2011). Terror from the Jurisprudential Point of View. فقه و اصول, 43(87), 153-184. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-183253