Terror from the Jurisprudential Point of View
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2011, Vol 43, Issue 87
Abstract
Terrorism is among the phenomena that has nowadays basically received the attention of political trends, media, and the researchers in the fields of politics, jurisprudence, and law. On the other hand, many of the distortions and unduly accusations made against Islam and the Muslims are related to this phenomenon. Thus, legal study of terrorism and its exploration from the viewpoint of jurisprudence seems necessary for providing an appropriate response to the onslaught of the enemies of Islam. This article, at first, addresses the semantics of the word terrorism in dictionaries of political sciences and re-examines the concepts synonym to it, such as: fatk (violent killing), ightiyāl (assassination), and irhāb (terror) in the earlier and modern literature and distinction of these concepts from each other as well as the words related to this discussion such as: baghy (injustice), muḥāriba (waging war), and jihād (holy war). In the section on legal study, while explaining the subject and the distinction of different kinds of terror, it examines different types of terror by the way of generic and specific proofs from the Qur’ānic verses and traditions. In the end, some of the propounded misconceptions are responded to and the jurists’ viewpoints about terror are touched upon.
Authors and Affiliations
AbdulkarīM AbdullāHī, RamaḍāN ‘AbbāSpūR Muqaddam
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP183253
- DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.3936
- Views 118
- Downloads 0
The maximum of dowry in Imamia jurisprudence
The increasing and unlimited cases of burdensome dowries beyond the husband's solvency, leading finally to the enforcement of dowry and divorce, had led some commentators to fix a certain maximum for dowry. The authors,...
A Critique on the Theory of the Necessity of the Oneness of Consort (Faḥl)
Among the causes for the prohibition of marriage is fosterage, which is one of the most important issues of concern. There is consensus among the jurists of all the Islamic schools in that fosterage is one of the causes...
A Rereading of the Jurisprudential Precept for Participation at the Dissidents’ Communal Prayers and Following Their Leadership with a Special Regard to Imam Khomein’s Viewpoint
A considerable part of the statements in different Shi’ite jurisprudential chapters expresses the practical obligations of the obliged (mukallafīn) with respect to the denominational dissidents. The concept of denominati...
Commitment to Non-remarriage in Traditions and Imāmī Jurisprudence
One of women’s psychological concerns is the remarriage of their husbands; however, the renowned majority of the jurists do not regard as valid the condition of non-remarriage due to its opposition to religious law. In t...
An Inquiry into the Reasons for the Jurists' Difference of Opinion in their Approach to Traditions
Difference of opinions among the jurists is quite tangible and obvious in jurisprudence. This difference of opinions can have various reasons, including difference in categorizing traditions, which arises from difference...