The AAlborg Model And pArTicipAnT direcTed leArning

Journal Title: Problems of Education in the 21st Century - Year 2009, Vol 18, Issue 12

Abstract

Preparing students for a life as active citizens in a democratic society is one of the aims within the Bologna process. The Council of Europe has also stressed the importance of focus on democracy in Higher Education. Higher Education is seen as important to develop a democratic culture among students. Teaching democracy should be promoted in lessons and curricula. It has been argued by many that practising citizenship is more effective in relation to „learning about”. Universities should rather be seen as ‘sites of citizenship’ and democracy than promotion democracy in terms of lessons and curricula (Biesta, 2005; Biesta, 2007; Biesta & Lawy, 2006; Van der Veen et al., 2007). Creating democratic learning systems in institutions of higher education could be the answer to reaching the aim related to democracy. A democratic learning system can be defned as a system where decisions, processes and behaviour related to learning are established through argumentation (discussion) or negotiation (dialog), voting or consensus (alone or in combination) between those affected by the decision simultaneously reaching the learning outcomes, the technical and professional knowledge and insight. In principle the participants must be equal with equal rights and feel committed to the values of rationality and impartiality (Qvist, 2005). The Aalborg Model practised at Aalborg University is a learning system which has collaborative democratic elements built into the model. This paper brings results from an online quantitative, questionnaire survey between nearly 200 engineering and science students in their second semester at Aalborg University. The main fndings are: Nearly 85 percent of the respondent’s state that their group uses discussions quite often or always to reach technical decisions. And a little more than 85 percent say that they use discussions to reach decisions related to project management. Almost 60 percent of the respondents state that the group is participant controlled quite often or always. Less than 4 percent are of the opinion that the group is controlled by the facilitator (quite often/always). 90 percent of the respondents are of the opinion that their group is democratic, 3 percent that it is elitist.

Authors and Affiliations

Palle Qvist

Keywords

Related Articles

THE MODERN EDUCATION AND THE SAFETY OF HEALTH OF STUDENTS IN CONTEXT OF PSYCHOLOGY-PEDAGOGICAL ACCOMPANIMENT OF THE PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AT HIGHER SCHOOL

In the paper a problem of the pedagogical support of students’ health maintenance during the period of their professional training at higher school is studied. On the stage of the educational-introductory practice an inn...

Taking STaff DeVelopmenT online: a TheoreTical perSpecTiVe of BeST pracTiceS for The 21st cenTury

Professional staff development is a continual process of individual and group assessment where the goal is to inform and improve practice in a school environment. The overall goal is to allow educators and communities...

THE COMPLEXITY OF THE EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH IN THE TEACHING OF MOTOR ACTIVITIES

The need to identify an educational dimension of the motor activities to be practiced in school context requires a disciplinary intersection between the sciences of education and the sciences of motion that outlines a...

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FARMER FIELD SCHOOLS’ EXTENSION METHODOLOGY IN CONSERVING SOIL AND WATER USING CONTOUR PLOUGHING, UNPLOUGHED STRIPS AND FARM YARD MANURE

Land degradation, characterized by bare ground, wanton destruction of vegetation and poor farming practices, still threatens food production in Africa where poverty and insuffcient resources for income generation impac...

bEnChmArKInG EDUCATIOnAl QUAlITy In AfrICAn UnIVErsITIEs: ThE CAsE Of ThE DEpArTmEnT Of mAThEmATICs AnD sCIEnCE EDUCATIOn, UnIVErsITy Of bOTsWAnA

A common mode of benchmarking educational quality in the world of academia is through the system of peer review. This system of benchmarking educational quality in many an African university adopts the use of external...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP34785
  • DOI -
  • Views 275
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Palle Qvist (2009). The AAlborg Model And pArTicipAnT direcTed leArning. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 18(12), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-34785