THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN CONTESTED PROCEDURE

Journal Title: JUSTICIA International Journal of Legal Sciences - Year 2019, Vol 7, Issue 12

Abstract

It is undisputed that proving in trials is one of the most fundamental and most important processes in the contested procedure. The court is responsible for reconstructing certain situations in a procedure that are based on facts that exist or existed at a given moment, with the purpose of using them in support of its final decision and other secondary decisions. In paragraph 2 of Article 206 of the Law on Contested Procedure, it is foreseen that the court decides to determine the object of proof, analyze and prove facts that are relevant to the particular case and which lead to the verification of the claims of the parties. Otherwise, the work of the court would be destined to failure. In order to avoid this problematic in the procedure, the maxima of “probation qui dicit, non eiquit negat" and "in exepiendoreus fit actor" applied in today's litigation are still current but in facilitating the practice of judges to avoid enormous claims of the parties, these procedural rules have been corrected by categorizing facts in several groups. In this context, on the one hand, we will treat each party's obligation to present facts and to propose evidence to support its request or to reject the allegations and facts of the opposing party in proceedings, the so-called subjective probative burden, and on the other hand, we will treat the parties' inability to prove the truth of the allegations in the procedure, the so-called objective probative burden. the burden of proof, the object of proof, the parties in the procedure, the evidence.

Authors and Affiliations

Bukurije Etemi-Ademi

Keywords

Related Articles

PUBLIC RELATIONS AND LACK OF TRANSPARENCY IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL DEBATES

We often hear that this century is about information, but is it information or disinformation, we will see it below. Once one could knock on the doors of our institutions and get the information by quoting the source, or...

THE NON-CONTENTIOUS PROCEEDINGS IN THE CIVIL LAW SYSTEM

The non-contentious proceedings are a special type of civil proceedings in which courts or other bodies or public officials proceed and decide in personal, family, property, and other legal matters (non-contentious matte...

DIGITAL MEDIA SHAPING DEMOCRACY: THE NEED FOR MEDIA LITERACY

The paper analyzes the new role of the media in the digital era: whether the end of the information monopoly of traditional news agencies led to diversity of opinions, more freedom and democracy or it created informative...

THE IMPORTANCE AND BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROCESS OF IDENTIFYING CRIMINAL SITUATIONS WITH ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

History has proved that the identification of criminal economic situations with an economic and financial character is a complex process, which implies engagement from professional experts of concrete areas, continuity,...

NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION

The International organizations generally differ regarding their extent of action. In this regard, it is important to mention the international organizations such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO is. The...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP656348
  • DOI -
  • Views 166
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Bukurije Etemi-Ademi (2019). THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN CONTESTED PROCEDURE. JUSTICIA International Journal of Legal Sciences, 7(12), 28-33. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-656348