The Comparison of Using Andesite Waste Powder and Fly Ash in Concrete

Journal Title: Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Dergisi - Year 2019, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

Andesite stone is widely used in civil engineering and architectural applications in Turkey. The production, cutting and polishing of the andesite stone by mining methods causes a large amount of waste. Some of them are big particular waste that is taken off pit and factories. And the others are powder waste derived during cutting in factories. These are wasted and not reclaimed. Andesite contains SiO2 as the main component. Therefore, andesite may have pozzolanicity and thus may be used as mineral additive in concrete. In this study the usage of andesite waste powder as mineral additive in concrete is compared with F type fly ashes. In order to estimate the status of mineral additives in various replacement levels; the 28 and 90 days compressive strengths of concrete specimens were tested by preparing concrete specimens in different cement dosages. For C40/50 strength class, the optimum replacement rate of andesite waste powder was determined as 10% at curing ages of 28 and 90 days. The results of this study show that andesite waste powder can be used as mineral additive in concrete such as fly ash. The usage of andesite waste powder as a mineral additive at the optimal replacement ratios can achieve savings of, 20 kg cement for C40/50, 46 kg of cement for C55/67, and 52 kg of cement for C70/85.

Authors and Affiliations

Hakan Ceylan

Keywords

Related Articles

Assessment of Winter Season Air Quality in the Marmara Region Using GIS and Air Quality Data

Marmara Region, one of the 7 geographical regions of Turkey, serves as a bridge connecting Europe and Asia. It has a surface area of approximately 67 thousand km2. When considered as a population, it’s determined that th...

Ethical Issues in Disaster Management

The predictions related to earthquakes have drawn the attention of society as well as media in the developing countries where the ‘common’ people have different perceptions. Most often, popular myths take over scientific...

The Neglected Creatures of Forests: Wild Bees

Although honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) is the best known as pollinator and most common species in ecosystems, there are approximately 16.000 bee species all over the world that have been described so far. The importance...

Role of Terracing and Reforestation Efforts on Improving Soil Properties in Degraded Steep Lands

Serious land degradation have been occurring during the building of new roads associated with the construction of Deriner Dam, one of 15 large dams planned by the General Directorate of State Hydraulic Affairs and implem...

Loss Estimation for Kırşehir Province According to Different Earthquake Scenarios

It is not possible to prevent earthquakes and to give notice in advance by using contemporary technological opportunities. However, it is possible to take precautions in order to minimize losses in case of an earthquake....

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP664491
  • DOI 10.21324/dacd.451558
  • Views 183
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hakan Ceylan (2019). The Comparison of Using Andesite Waste Powder and Fly Ash in Concrete. Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Dergisi, 5(1), 110-115. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-664491