The Concept of Political Difference in Oliver Marchart and its Relationship with the Heideggerian Concept of Ontological Difference
Journal Title: Conatus - Journal of Philosophy - Year 2019, Vol 4, Issue 1
Abstract
The concept of political difference addresses the distinction between politics and the political. The political refers to the ontological making possible of the various domains of society, including the domain of politics in a narrow sense. Political difference was introduced as a reaction to the theoretical controversy between foundationalism and anti-foundationalism. This reaction took the form of post-foundationalism. According to Marchart, post-foundationalism does not entirely deny the possibility of grounding. It only denies the possibility of an ultimate transcendent foundation insofar as this ontological impossibility makes possible the historical and contingent grounds in plural. The Heideggerian concept of ontological difference also undermines the possibility of an ultimate ontic ground, which establishes the presence of all other beings. If one wants to think beyond the concept of ground, one should obtain a clear understanding of Being as Being, namely one should grasp the difference between Being and beings. All the same, Heidegger tends to replace the ontic grounds of metaphysics with Being itself as a new kind of ultimate ontological foundation. Moreover, in many points of Heideggerian argumentation one can detect traces of a second alternative understanding of ontological difference, which does not belong in Heidegger’s intentions and undermines the primordiality of Being. This alternative understanding establishes a reciprocity between Being and beings. In our view, political difference not only is based in this second way of understanding but, at the same time, develops more decisively the mutual interdependence between Being and beings. In political difference the grounding part, namely the political, possesses both a grounding as well as a derivative character. Politics and political ground and dislocate each other in an incessant and oscillating historical procedure, which undermines any form of completion of the social.
Authors and Affiliations
Christoforos Efthimiou
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP671752
- DOI 10.12681/cjp.18863
- Views 83
- Downloads 0
H. Tristram Engelhardt Junior: A Moral Friend and Moral Stranger
This paper is a tribute to H.T. Engelhardt Jr. for the intellectual resources he provided to challenge cosmopolitan liberalism as the foundation for an overarching global bioethics in the post-modern world. It is a also...
Τέχνη και αλήθεια στον Αριστοτέλη
Οι παλαιότεροι ερμηνευτές του Περὶ Ποιητικῆς εγκλώβισαν αυτήν τη σχέση στην έννοια της αληθοφάνειας, γεγονός όχι άσχετο με την ταύτιση της έννοιας της μιμήσεως με τον απλό αντικατοπτρισμό των καθ’ ἕκαστα της πραγματικότη...
Alain Renaut on Right and Politics
This study focuses on the relation between law and good. It examines whether the concept of “good” in a society has preceded the establishment of the state or not. This is an issue that concerns the way of integrating la...
Η σύγκρουση της αριστοτελικής αρετής με τον σύγχρονο πολιτικό ρεαλισμό
Η αρετή κατά την Αριστοτέλη αποτελεί το μέσο για την πραγμάτωση του ανωτέρου όλων των αγαθών, της ευδαιμονίας. Η θέση αυτή είναι διάχυτη σε μεγάλο αριθμό έργων του όπως στα Πολιτικά, στα Ἠθικὰ Νικομάχεια, στα Ἠθικὰ Εὐδήμ...
Leo Strauss, The three waves of modernity
Greek translation of Leo Strauss, The three waves of modernity