THE CONTROVERSIES OF UKRAINIAN LUSTRATION

Abstract

The political analysis of lustration in Ukraine as an institutional practice of public administration has been made in the article. Lustration is defined as personnel policy, which involves the exclusion of certain categories of persons from the system of public administration for a certain time. According to the model, the lustration in Ukraine is a «severe» administrative ban (10-year suspensions) and a «judicial ban» (5-year suspensions). The uniqueness of Ukrainian lustration is in the possibility of including in the system of public administration persons who are subject to the lustration requirements, subject to receiving them the status of participants in the Antiterrorist operation. The Ukrainian lustration is a «late», by time, so-called «lustration of the second wave». The expanded object of lustration is applicable to three categories of persons: 1) those who were involved in the usurpation of power in the time of V. Yanukovych; 2) persons who worked in the Communist Party leadership positions in the Komsomol were secret servants of special services; 3) workers who could not prove the legal, noncorrupt nature of their property acquired while they stay at the governmental posts. The advanced lustration facility in Ukraine (the inclusion of the first category 1) of the people who held positions under the presidency of V. Yanukovich and the third) corrupted corresponds to the practice of late lustration in the CEE countries, in particular, such restrictions were in force in Bulgaria, Romania, for «Successful capitalists «or» «Lending millionaires». In 2014–2017 was the third attempt to introduce lustration in Ukraine, as it was noted in the article. The initiative belonged to the public, and it arose even during the events of the Revolution of Dignity. The beginning of the institutionalization process (adoption of the Law «On the Purge of Power», the creation of the lustrous register) was the result of the joint activities of public and state leaders. Summing up, it has been proved that the lustration in Ukraine is a political process, the necessity of which is determined by the need for the self-defense of a democratic state in the process of transformational change. Ukrainian lustration practice causes a lot of social discussions, conflicts of interest in political elites, but, in general, it promotes the consolidation of democracy in the country.

Authors and Affiliations

N. Minenkova

Keywords

Related Articles

NEOREALIST THEORY AND ITS PLACE IN THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH

Present article is focused on the evolution of the neorealist theory and its applica¬bility for the international relations and foreign policy research under modern circum¬stances. It is showed in the article that fundam...

REPRODUCTIVE PROBLEMS OF FAMILY DEVELOPMENT IN THE MODERN SOCIETY

Based on the analysis of the latest changes in the family as social institute the article reveals and describes new tendencies in population genesial cycle in terms of social changes and in the context of evolutional and...

FEATURES AND PROBLEMS OF MUTUAL PERCEPTION IN SOUTH KOREA AND JAPAN (1998–2015)

This article analyzes problems of perception in the bilateral South Korean-Japanese relations within the period from 1998 to 2015 which author divided into four subperiods for analysis convenience. In that article the ch...

MODERN CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF MIGRATION PROCESSES IN SOCIOLOGICAL DISCOURSE

This article is devoted to the modern theoretical concepts of migration. The main advantages and disadvantages of modern sociological theories of migration were identified. There were presented the most optimal methodolo...

THE THEORETICAL BASICS OF RESEARCH OF THE SUBCULTURE OF POWER

This article is devoted to the studies of subculture of power. The special attention is given to the problem of methodological principles and methods of determines the specific features which belong to subculture of powe...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP262380
  • DOI 10.18524/2304-1439.2017.2(29).119964
  • Views 90
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

N. Minenkova (2017). THE CONTROVERSIES OF UKRAINIAN LUSTRATION. Вісник Одеського національного університету. Соціологія і політичні науки, 22(2), 126-134. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-262380