The criterion fatwa in legislation within the legal system of Islamic Republic of Iran (Another look at Superior Knowledgeability in the Shia state fiqh system)
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2015, Vol 47, Issue 102
Abstract
Undoubtedly, legislation in any governmental system is based on its intellectual – philosophical foundations and special ideology. Hence, in an Islamic society, religious rules must be criteria of legislation in order to make those laws authentic and valid for the people. In this research, we have reviewed the historical past of the argument shortly, and have studied various possibilities for criterion fatwa in legislation, i.e. jurists’ common fatwa, fatwa based on caution, fatwa of the supreme knowledgeable jurist, and any jurisprudential fatwa. Thus, we have come to the conclusion that with regard to jurisprudential foundations, the fatwa of the supreme knowledgeable jurist is closer to authority and authenticity. Then, with reference to the criteria of ‘Superior Knowledgeability’ in political jurisprudence, we have reached the conclusion that in an Islamic state, the superiorly knowledgeable jurist is the same ‘ruling jurist’ testified by the elites of the Islamic community for his knowledgeability in conducting the affairs of the society based on Islamic measures. In the final step and according to the above-mentioned, the procedures available in the Islamic Republic with regard to criterion fatwa in legislation have been explicated and explained. The verdict and fatwa of the ruling jurist becomes the criterion for legislation in the Islamic state, either directly or through a secondary analysis and based on a delegation enshrined in the constitution (the delegation to the assembly in taking any jurisprudential fatwa and the delegation awarded to the jurists of Guardian Council in the exercise of his jurisprudential opinion). Therefore, the legitimacy and authority of the laws of the Islamic Republic are ultimately attributable to the verdict of the ruling jurist.
Authors and Affiliations
hadi Hajzadeh
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP190136
- DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v47i22.23950
- Views 104
- Downloads 0
Comparison and Comparative Examination of the Principle of Jubb (Acquittance from Previous Obligations) and General Amnesty from the Viewpoint of Jurisprudence and Law
One of the legal principles for the disbelievers who convert to Islam is the principle of jubb. This principle is the basis of Islamic mercy and clemency for denial of punishment of the disbelievers who welcome Islam. On...
The Role of Verity Proposition in Principles of Jurisprudence
The dynamism of the verity proposition has led to its being used in various issues and sciences as the founder for the general and constant principles. The principles of jurisprudence, as a science that is the founder fo...
Religious Law Taste
The word madhāq (taste, perceptive aptitude) in its compound form madhāq-i shari‘at (religious law taste) or madhāq-i shāri‘ (lawmaker’s taste) and the like, have been employed by the Imāmī jurists and theologians for ab...
Legal-Juridical Study of Conditional Option in Unilateral Obligation
In civil law, khiyārāt (options or rights of withdrawal) is a topic concerning contracts. Also, in article 456 of civil law, khiyār is viewed as related to transactions. In statuary jurisprudence and law, there is little...
A Research on the Criterion for Investigation about the Justice of the Anonymous
One of the most important legal issues debated among the jurists is whether it is necessary or unnecessary to investigate the justice of the anonymous and to what extent. The renowned majority of the jurists maintain tha...