The effect of applied nanozeolite and some plant residues on organic carbon changes in density and soluble fractions - i

Journal Title: Agricultural Advances - Year 2014, Vol 3, Issue 11

Abstract

The present paper studies organic carbon changes in diffrent fractions in a soil treated with different levels of nanozeolite, alfalfa and wheat residue and incubated for 90 days. The results showed that the amounts of light fraction (LF) and heavy fraction (HF) increased with increasing the percentage of nanozeolite and plant residues in the soil. The highest amounts of LF (7.54 g LF/Kg Soil) and HF (11.10 g C/Kg Soil) were found when 30% nanozeolite, 5% wheat and alfalfa straws was added to the soil. Accordingly wheat straw and alfalfa straw were effective for increasing the LF and HF respectively. However they decreased with decreasing the soil organic matter (SOM) from the 1st day of experiment until the 90th day of experiment. In addition to that, soluble organic carbon fraction plays an important role in soil and many ecosystem processes. Soluble organic carbon in hot (2.22 g C/Kgsoil) and cool (1.54 g C/Kgsoil) water fractions increased with the addition of 30% nanozeolite and 5% plant residues particularly alfalfa straw in comparison with control. Although they increased after 30 days of incubation and then they decreased in the continuation of the experiment. In fact, organic carbon (OC) contents in density and soluble fractions increased with application and addition of 30% nanozeolite and 5% plant residues into the soil, However they decreased with decreasing the SOM after 30 days of incubation. This study revealed that, application of nanozeolite and plant residues improve carbon pools in density and soluble fractions and carbon sequestration increase by increasing the OC contents in soil.

Authors and Affiliations

M. Mirzaei Aminiyan*| Soil Science Department, College of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, IRAN., A. A. Safari Sinegani| Soil Science Department, College of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, IRAN., M. Sheklabadi| Soil Science Department, College of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, IRAN.

Keywords

Related Articles

Modern technologies and Nigerian’s small scale farmers: constraints and prospects of its adoption

In spite of abundant modern technologies and guide lines available for use in increasing Agricultural productivity, most of the Nigeria small scale farmers who constitute the majority in agricultural sector cannot adop...

Effects of humic acid and organic matter on quantitative yield and macro-element absorption in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

This research intended to study the effects of various levels of humic acid and organic matter forming the substrate for rice seeds of the Tarom cultivar to germinate and for seedlings to grow. For this purpose, an exp...

Status and challenges of smallholder dairy cattle production in the highlands of Bale, Southeast Ethiopia

A diagnostic survey was conducted in the highlands of Bale, Southeast Ethiopia with the objectives to assess the status and challenges of smallholder dairy cattle production. The study area was stratified into two base...

Prevalence of helminth parasites in Gallus domesticus from Gurez valley

During the study period of two years the prevalence of helminth parasites in domestic fowl from Gurez valley were analysed. A total of 137 domestic fowl were examined for helminth parasites from May 2013 to April 2015....

Investigation and comparison of sweet corn hybrids yield after rice harvesting

In order to investigation and compare of kernel and other traits of eight sweet corn hybrids with conventional sweet corn (SC403) an expriment was conducted in randomized compelet block design at the Agricultural a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP564
  • DOI 10.14196/aa.v3i11.1735
  • Views 460
  • Downloads 23

How To Cite

M. Mirzaei Aminiyan*, A. A. Safari Sinegani, M. Sheklabadi (2014). The effect of applied nanozeolite and some plant residues on organic carbon changes in density and soluble fractions - i. Agricultural Advances, 3(11), 280-291. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-564