The Effect of Two Bulk-Fill Resin Composites on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth

Journal Title: Cumhuriyet Dental Journal - Year 2019, Vol 22, Issue 3

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two commercially available bulk-fill restorative materials on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated human molar teeth. Materials and methods: A total of 44 mandibular third molar were divided into four groups: Group 1; 4 mm thick bulk-fill fluid composite (SDR ™, Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) was applied to the cavities. The restoration of the proximal walls and the occlusal region was completed with posterior composite (Valux Plus, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). Group 2; 4 mm thick fiber-resin reinforced bulk-fill composite (EverX Posterior; GC Corp., Japan) was placed in the cavities and the procedure in Group 1 was repeated.  Group 3 (negative control group); no restoration was applied to the cavities. Group 4 (positive control group); comprised intact molar teeth without any treatment. The root canals were shaped using rotary instruments, irrigated with NaOCl, and obturated. All samples were incubated in distilled water at 37˚C for 1 week and then fracture strength test was performed. The values were recorded in Newton and the data were evaluated using Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: No statistically significant difference (p >0.05 ) was observed between group 1, 2, and the positive control group. However, the bulk-fill fluid composite material showed higher fracture resistance than the fiber-resin reinforced composite material (p<0.05). The highest fracture resistance was observed in the positive control group. The fracture resistance of the negative control group was statistically lower than the other groups (p<0.05). Conclusions: Both of the bulk-fill restorative materials in  endodontically treated teeth showed similar fracture resistance  to  intact teeth. In addition, the clinical use of the bulk-fill fluid composites may be recommended because of their high fracture resistance and ease of application.

Authors and Affiliations

Özlem ÜSTÜN, Öznur GÜÇLÜER

Keywords

Related Articles

Fortification of Fractured Instrument Removal Simulated Roots Using Several Calcium Silicate-Based Materials

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the forces required to fracture roots obturated with different calcium silicate – based materials, after applying a fractured instrument removal simulation. Material an...

Goldenhar Syndrome–A Case Report

Goldenhar Syndrome also called as facio-auriculo-vertebral dysplasia, is a rare syndrome developing from first and second pharyngeal arches during Blastogenesis. It was described by Maurice Goldenhar in 1952. It is chara...

Ultrasonographic evaluation of mandibular elevator muscles to assess effects of attrition-type tooth wear on masticatory function

Objectives: Occlusal alterations may result in changes in the functional performance of masticatory muscles. This study was planned to evaluate mandibular elevator muscles of patients with dental attrition by using ultra...

Effect of Surface Finishing Methods and Aging on Surface Roughness and Optical Properties of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Glass-Ceramic

ABSTRACT Objectives: The effects of three different surface finishing methods and aging on the surface roughness and optical properties of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) glass-ceramic were investigated. Ma...

Efficacy of XP-Endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation on Modified Triple Antibiotic Paste Removal

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare conventional needle irrigation (CNI), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and XP-endo Finisher (XPF) techniques in terms of modified triple antibiotic paste (mTAP) remova...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP634423
  • DOI 10.7126/cumudj.559180
  • Views 82
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Özlem ÜSTÜN, Öznur GÜÇLÜER (2019). The Effect of Two Bulk-Fill Resin Composites on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 22(3), 345-350. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-634423