The “emergency constitutional review” and Polish constitutional crisis of constitutional self-defense and judicial empowerment
Journal Title: Polish Law Review - Year 2016, Vol 2, Issue 1
Abstract
Courts that owe their existence to democratic institutional choice must act prudently, or the choice may be withdrawn” and the Polish Constitutional Tribunal is no exception. On balance, its jurisprudence of 30 years respected the choices made by the principal or, using M. Shapiro’s words, the Tribunal acted prudently and has built credibility and legitimacy incomparably greater than that of other Polish public institutions. Yet, the current attack on the Tribunal is not premised on the dissatisfaction with the overall performance or particular acts of the Tribunal, but rather strikes at its very existence and the very premiss of judicial review. We are not dealing with some hasty decisions of the majority being the result of the transient dissatisfaction with the Tribunal’s case law. If this was the case, we would not have reasons to sound off the alarm as political tinkering with the unwanted decisions taken by constitutional courts happen all the time and everywhere. It forms part of more larger and sophisticated plan aimed at debilitating possible pockets of resistance and independence, curbing democracy, the rule of law and the division of powers.<br/><br/>In this paper I will argue that when the demos indeed chooses independent judges and courts as dispute resolvers and subjects them only to the Constitution and statutes (art. 173 and 178 of the Polish Constitution), the rule of law (art. 2 of the Constitution), elevates the Constitution to the status of the supreme law of the land (art. 8 of the Constitution), makes the separation of powers with checks and balances as one of the cornerstones of the Republic of Poland (art. 10 of the Constitution) and the judgments of the Tribunal universally binding and final (art. 190 of the Constitution), and, last but not least, inserts direct application of the constitution into the Constitution itself (art. 8(2)), the demos must then accept that courts will be ready to take these systemic features seriously and rule against the whimsical and instrumental politics of the day. It is now beyond dispute that there is a gradual constitutional coup d’état in Poland whereby the Constitution is being modified through legislative sleight of hand. In these extraordinary constitutional circumstances, the constitutional review by the ordinary courts is simply a necessary and urgent response to the relentless and no-holds-barred politics of the parliamentary majority of the day. The response must has at its core self - defense of the constitutional essentials mentioned above. Judges cannot simply stand by and watch the legal order torn apart in the name of “the people”. They must defend the Republic and uphold the law. This is exactly what they are sworn to do. Nothing less, nothing more.<br/><br/>The government’s persistent refusal to publish judgments of the Tribunal brings to the fore a more general question of whether the constitutional integrity, rule of law and systemic coherence of Polish legal order, might be secured through legal means other than centralised constitutional review? Below I will argue in favour of “emergency constitutional review” exercised by the ordinary courts. Such review is defended on the ground of the constitutional self-defence and judicial empowerment that must be resorted to in the name of constitutional essentials and constitutional integrity. The emergency review is to ensure that, despite the emasculation of the review functions of the Tribunal and its ensuing paralysis, the Constitution remains the supreme law of the land.<br/><br/>
Authors and Affiliations
Tomasz Koncewicz
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP187516
- DOI 10.5604/24509841.1232099
- Views 170
- Downloads 0
Dziedziczenie przez dziadków spadkodawcy w polskim prawie cywilnym
W niniejszym artykule przeanalizowano zasady dziedziczenia ustawowego dziadków spadkodawcy. Wykazano, że ich sytuacja spadkowa uległa poprawie w wyniku dokonanych w niedawno zmian w polskim kodeksie cywilnym. Zauważono j...
Klauzula sumienia w prawie karnym
Klauzula sumienia, jako wyraz wolności myśli, sumienia i wyznania, wpisuje się w sferę wartości, które legły u podstaw demokratycznego społeczeństwa. Dosyć powszechnie formułowane są poglądy o istnieniu „generalnej klauz...
Opinia o Nowelizacji - oddalamy się od Europy
Zamieszanie prawne jakie spowodowało polityczne zawirowania wokół wyboru sędziów Trybunału Konstytucyjnego trwa w Polsce już prawie rok. Niestety nadal nie widać finału sporu. W próbę jego rozwiązania zaangażowały się ni...
Obowiązywanie prawa w ujęciu skandynawskiego realizmu prawnego
Celem artykułu jest rekonstrukcja głównych filozoficznych założeń leżących u podstaw skandynawskiego realizmu prawnego. Przedstawiciele tego nurtu w filozofii prawa odrzucili idealizm dominujący w skandynawskiej filozofi...
Jednomyślność w Interpretacji Konstytucyjnej: Doktrynalny Rozwój poczyniony przez litewskie i mołdawskie Trybunały Konstytucyjne
Artykuł poświęcony jest analizie niektórych wyroków Litewskich i Mołdawskich Trybunałów Konstytucyjnych, które zdaniem autora niniejszego artykułu, wskazują na "konstytucyjną jednomyślność", ponieważ sądy w czasie rozpat...