The empirical content of theories in judgment and decision making: Shortcomings and remedies

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 8

Abstract

According to Karl Popper, we can tell good theories from poor ones by assessing their empirical content (empirischer Gehalt), which basically reflects how much information they convey concerning the world. “The empirical content of a statement increases with its degree of falsifiability: the more a statement forbids, the more it says about the world of experience.” Two criteria to evaluate the empirical content of a theory are their level of universality (Allgemeinheit) and their degree of precision (Bestimmtheit). The former specifies how many situations it can be applied to. The latter refers to the specificity in prediction, that is, how many subclasses of realizations it allows. We conduct an analysis of the empirical content of theories in Judgment and Decision Making (JDM) and identify the challenges in theory formulation for different classes of models. Elaborating on classic Popperian ideas, we suggest some guidelines for publication of theoretical work.

Authors and Affiliations

Andreas Glöckner and Tilmann Betsch

Keywords

Related Articles

Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferences

We conducted an experimental study on social preferences using dictator games similar to Fehr et al. (2008). Our results show that social preferences differ between subjects who receive low-stakes monetary rewards for th...

Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation

Individual differences in cognitive abilities and skills can predict normatively superior and logically consistent judgments and decisions. The current experiment investigates the processes that mediate individual differ...

Psychological aspects of the rejection of recycled water: Contamination, purification and disgust

There is a worldwide and increasing shortage of potable fresh water. Modern water reclamation technologies can alleviate much of the problem by converting wastewater directly into drinking water, but there is public resi...

Ability, chance, and ambiguity aversion: Revisiting the competence hypothesis

Individuals are often ambiguity-averse when choosing among purely chance-based prospects (Ellsberg, 1961). However, they often prefer apparently ambiguous ability-based prospects to unambiguous chance-based prospects. Ac...

Graphs versus numbers: How information format affects risk aversion in gambling

In lottery gambling, the common phenomenon of risk aversion shows up as preference of the option with the higher win probability, even if a riskier alternative offers a greater expected value. Because riskier choices wou...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677855
  • DOI -
  • Views 137
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Andreas Glöckner and Tilmann Betsch (2011). The empirical content of theories in judgment and decision making: Shortcomings and remedies. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677855