THE EQUALITY PRINCIPLE REQUIREMENTS
Journal Title: Challenges of the Knowledge Society - Year 2013, Vol 3, Issue 0
Abstract
The problem premises and the objectives followed: the idea of inserting the equality principle between the freedom and the justice principles is manifested in positive law in two stages, as a general idea of all judicial norms and as requirement of the owner of a subjective right of the applicants of an objective law. Equality in face of the law and of public authorities can not involve the idea of standardization, of uniformity, of enlisting of all citizens under the mark of the same judicial regime, regardless of their natural or socio-professional situation. Through the Beijing Platform and the position documents of the European Commission we have defined the integrative approach of equality as representing an active and visible integration of the gender perspective in all sectors and at all levels. The research methods used are: the conceptualist method, the logical method and the intuitive method necessary as means of reasoning in order to argue our demonstration. We have to underline the fact that the system analysis of the research methods of the judicial phenomenon doesn’t agree with “value ranking”, because one value cannot be generalized in rapport to another. At the same time, we must fight against a methodological extremism. The final purpose of this study is represented by the reaching of the perfecting/excellence stage by all individuals through the promotion of equality and freedom. This supposes the fact that the existence of a non-discrimination favourable frame (fairness) represents a means and a condition of self-determination, and the state of perfection/excellency is a result of this self-determination, the condition necessary for the obtaining of this nondiscrimination frame for all of us and in conditions of freedom for all individuals, represents the same condition that promotes the state of perfection/excellency. In conclusion we may state the fact that the equality principle represents a true catalyst of the Romanian law constitution phenomenon, succeeding not just in entraining significant modifications of the legislation, but also determining an obvious acceleration of his phenomenon, an enlargement and in the same time further studies.
Authors and Affiliations
CLAUDIA ANDRIŢOI
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP162611
- DOI -
- Views 124
- Downloads 0
THE JURIDICAL REGIME OF SANCTIONING THE PERFORMANCE OF AN ACTIVITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMMUNITY
The sanctioning of performing an activity for the benefit of the community is always established alternately with the fine or penalty and certain deeds that constitute contraventions are sanctioned. This sanction may be...
THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE INHERITED DEBT AND THE RIGHT OF OPTION ON SUCCESSION
A natural person’s patrimony consists, apart from rights (assets of the succession), of a liabilities side as well related to obligations that the patrimony’s holder bequeaths onto the heirs following his/her death. The...
THE EFFICACY OF THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN A SIMULATED ACT
The article focuses on the effects that an arbitration clause can still produce when it is contained in a simulated operation, whether it is in the apparent act or in the secret one, depending on the forms of simulation....
LATEST AMENDMENTS TO LAW NO 62/2011 ON SOCIAL DIALOGUE ENACTED BY LAW NO 1/2016
Law no 62/2011 regarding the social dialogue is the most important regulation of the collective labor relations. Since 2011, when it was adopted, Law no 62/2011 was modified several times, the last legislative interventi...
THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSIDIARITY – THE LEGAL BASIS FOR THE PARTICIPATION OF NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS AT THE EUROPEAN UNION’S LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITY
The communication aims to emphasize the context in which the principle of subsidiarity was adopted, clarifying the dilemma about its purpose: is it a legal instrument to protect national sovereignty of the European Union...