The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal

Journal Title: Medical Journal Armed Forces - Year 2017, Vol 73, Issue 2

Abstract

Peer reviewers are expected to be experts in a field of study and should be versed with the pertinent literature related with the manuscript they are reviewing. Editors might not necessarily be experts in a particular field, but they have the responsibility of overseeing the requests made by peers, and assessing whether these are ethically appropriate, or not. Thus, requests by peers to cite unrelated literature, which may or may not be their own literature, could be unethical, especially if the objective is to improve their own citations or to boost the citations of the journal for which they are reviewing. In contrast, requests to cite pertinent work that is in fact missing from the paper's literature, even if it may be the reviewer or editor's work, or from the same journal, is acceptable. Editors ultimately approve the requests and suggestions made by reviewers, so inappropriate suggestions made by peer reviewers are the responsibility of the editor and journal. There needs to be a bias-free mechanism in place that offers protection to authors who wish to complain, and consequences for editors who do not conduct an impartial decision. Authors have the right to challenge such suggestions, but may face unfair retaliation in the form of a rejection if they resist making changes that they perceive as being inappropriate.

Authors and Affiliations

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

Keywords

Related Articles

Evaluation of near infrared spectroscopy as screening tool for detecting intracranial hematomas in patients with traumatic brain injury

Background: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is one of the most common surgical emergencies in service hospitals of India. Computed tomography (CT) has been a consistent and reliable technique for detecting intracranial hemo...

Comparison between continuous thoracic epidural block and continuous thoracic paravertebral block in the management of thoracic trauma

Background: Postoperative pain is thought to be the single most important factor leading to ineffective ventilation and impaired secretion clearance after thoracic trauma. Effective pain relief can be provided by thoraci...

Sense of coherence and self reported health amongst medical students: A cross sectional study

Background: In late 70s, Antonovsky proposed a salutogenic theory. This theory was based on the assumption that the human environment causes stress, and sense of coherence could serve as a stress-resisting resource. This...

Ectopic pregnancy: Review of 80 cases

Background: Ectopic pregnancy or extrauterine pregnancy will invariably result in abortion or rupture. Though there are risk factors for ectopic pregnancy, but at times the condition can occur without any apparent predis...

Combat psychiatry: Indian perspective

Indian Armed Forces have been engaged in various combat duties for long. The adverse effect of prolonged and repetitive deployment of troops in these highly stressful environment leads to many combat stress behaviors as...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP623288
  • DOI 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.11.008
  • Views 78
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva (2017). The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal. Medical Journal Armed Forces, 73(2), 181-183. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-623288