The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal

Journal Title: Medical Journal Armed Forces - Year 2017, Vol 73, Issue 2

Abstract

Peer reviewers are expected to be experts in a field of study and should be versed with the pertinent literature related with the manuscript they are reviewing. Editors might not necessarily be experts in a particular field, but they have the responsibility of overseeing the requests made by peers, and assessing whether these are ethically appropriate, or not. Thus, requests by peers to cite unrelated literature, which may or may not be their own literature, could be unethical, especially if the objective is to improve their own citations or to boost the citations of the journal for which they are reviewing. In contrast, requests to cite pertinent work that is in fact missing from the paper's literature, even if it may be the reviewer or editor's work, or from the same journal, is acceptable. Editors ultimately approve the requests and suggestions made by reviewers, so inappropriate suggestions made by peer reviewers are the responsibility of the editor and journal. There needs to be a bias-free mechanism in place that offers protection to authors who wish to complain, and consequences for editors who do not conduct an impartial decision. Authors have the right to challenge such suggestions, but may face unfair retaliation in the form of a rejection if they resist making changes that they perceive as being inappropriate.

Authors and Affiliations

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

Keywords

Related Articles

Simulum fly bites

Military personnel deployed in mountainous regions in northern and north eastern India face risk of insect and arthropod borne diseases as an occupational hazard. The risk further increases during long outdoor campaigns...

Outbreak of Prototheca wickerhamii algaemia and sepsis in a tertiary care chemotherapy oncology unit

Background: Prototheca is an emerging, opportunistic, pathogenic, zoonotic achlorophyllous green alga, expanding in pathogenicity and host range, causing localized and disseminated infections. This outbreak of Prototheca...

Current trends in tuberculosis vaccine

Despite the global efforts made to control tuberculosis (TB) and the large number of available new anti-TB drugs, TB still affects one-third of the world population. The conventional vaccine bacille CalmetteeGuerin (BCG...

Direct acting oral anticoagulant: Bench to bedside

Vitamin K antagonists are an effective group of oral anticoagulants. However because of genetic variability in their metabolism and multiple food and drug interactions, these drugs have narrow therapeutic window with unp...

Supraventricular tachycardia requiring repeated cardioversion in a 32-day-old baby

Cardiac arrhythmia is not so uncommon in a young infant but recognition in neonate and infant is not easy. The management of cardiac arrhythmia with cardiogenic shock, nonresponsive to pharmacological cardioversion in a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP623288
  • DOI 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.11.008
  • Views 77
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva (2017). The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal. Medical Journal Armed Forces, 73(2), 181-183. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-623288