The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal

Journal Title: Medical Journal Armed Forces - Year 2017, Vol 73, Issue 2

Abstract

Peer reviewers are expected to be experts in a field of study and should be versed with the pertinent literature related with the manuscript they are reviewing. Editors might not necessarily be experts in a particular field, but they have the responsibility of overseeing the requests made by peers, and assessing whether these are ethically appropriate, or not. Thus, requests by peers to cite unrelated literature, which may or may not be their own literature, could be unethical, especially if the objective is to improve their own citations or to boost the citations of the journal for which they are reviewing. In contrast, requests to cite pertinent work that is in fact missing from the paper's literature, even if it may be the reviewer or editor's work, or from the same journal, is acceptable. Editors ultimately approve the requests and suggestions made by reviewers, so inappropriate suggestions made by peer reviewers are the responsibility of the editor and journal. There needs to be a bias-free mechanism in place that offers protection to authors who wish to complain, and consequences for editors who do not conduct an impartial decision. Authors have the right to challenge such suggestions, but may face unfair retaliation in the form of a rejection if they resist making changes that they perceive as being inappropriate.

Authors and Affiliations

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

Keywords

Related Articles

Performance of Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS) as screening tool for diabetes in an urban slum

Background: India is diabetic capital of world, with maximum number of diabetic patients. There is large burden of undetected diabetic cases in community. There is increasing risk of diabetes in urban slum, because of il...

Survivors of deliberate self-harm attempt in the military milieu: An exploratory study of psychiatric morbidity and psychosocial correlates

Background: Deliberate self-harm (DSH) is common in modern society. A million people worldwide die from suicide each year, leading to a large toll on human resources and economy. Research has revealed DSH as an important...

Forward surgical care: Emerging issues and challenges.

War strategies have been evolving with time and battlefield casualty care services have been trying to keep pace with the changing demands. Technological advances in the field of trauma care have revolutionised the way i...

E-Licensing of Radiation Applications (eLORA) in Armed Forces Hospitals: 'Nuts and Bolts'

As per current statutory requirement, licence for operation of all medical radiation facilities (diagnostic radiology/radiotherapy/nuclear medicine) in India has to be obtained using the e-Licensing of Radiation Applicat...

Gallstone ileus: A diagnostic and therapeutic challenge

Gallstone ileus first described in 1654 by Dr. Erasmus Bartholin, is a mechanical obstruction caused by impaction of one or more gall stones within gastrointestinal tract.1 Overall reported incidence is 1–4% of mechanica...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP623288
  • DOI 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.11.008
  • Views 80
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva (2017). The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal. Medical Journal Armed Forces, 73(2), 181-183. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-623288