The Gazprom Case: Lessons of the Past For the Future

Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2017, Vol 10, Issue 16

Abstract

Under the EU Merger Regulation, if the Commission has concerns that a merger may significantly affect competition in the European Union, the merging companies may propose modifications to the project that would guarantee continued competition on the market. The Commission may declare a concentration compatible with the common market following such a modification by the parties and attach to its decision conditions and obligations intended to ensure that the undertakings comply with the commitments. In other words, commitments have to be offered by the parties but the Commission may introduce conditions and obligations if they are required to ensure the enforceability of commitments. Meanwhile the scope to propose merger modifications and the level of discretion of the competition authority are quite different under the Law on Competition of the Republic of Lithuania, adopted almost two decades ago. The goal of this paper is to reveal those differences and, with the help of the jurisprudence of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania in the Gazprom case, to explain how this may impact future cases.

Authors and Affiliations

Dalia Višinskienė, Justina Nasutavičienė

Keywords

Related Articles

Antitrust Aviation Seminar – Faculty of Management, University Warsaw (Poland), 12 October 2016 (conference report)

The Antitrust Aviation Seminar was held on October 12, 2016 at the Faculty of Management of University of Warsaw. The event was organized by Center for Antitrust and Regulatory Studies (CARS) of the Faculty under auspice...

The Influence of Economic Theories and Schools on Competition Law in terms of Vertical Agreements

The paper aims at showing the influence and the views espoused by economic theories and schools of economics on competition policy embedded in antitrust law and conducted by competition authorities in the field of vertic...

Daria Kostecka-Jurczyk, Koncentracja w formie wspólnego przedsiębiorstwa a ryzyko konkurencyjne w świetle prawa antymonopolowego [The concentration in the form of a joint venture and the competition risk in the light of antimonopoly law],C.H. Beck, Warsaw 2017, 304 p.

Joint ventures may create risks for competition. Those risks may be carried by the very structure of the relevant market, or the creation of conditions fostering the coordination of the market conduct of a joint venture...

Annual Conference on European State Aid Law 2016. Trier (Germany), 24–25 November 2016. (conference report)

On 24–25 November 2016, the Academy of European Law (ERA) hosted in Trier the Annual Conference on European State Aid Law 2016, organised with the support of Jacques Derenne (Sheppard Mullin, Brussels...

Editorial foreword

The Editorial Board is pleased to present the 16th volume of the Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies (YARS 2017, 10(16)). This is the only ‘regular’ volume of YARS to be published in 2017 – a second volume, dedi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP318454
  • DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.16.3
  • Views 71
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dalia Višinskienė, Justina Nasutavičienė (2017). The Gazprom Case: Lessons of the Past For the Future. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 10(16), 57-76. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-318454