The Gazprom Case: Lessons of the Past For the Future

Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2017, Vol 10, Issue 16

Abstract

Under the EU Merger Regulation, if the Commission has concerns that a merger may significantly affect competition in the European Union, the merging companies may propose modifications to the project that would guarantee continued competition on the market. The Commission may declare a concentration compatible with the common market following such a modification by the parties and attach to its decision conditions and obligations intended to ensure that the undertakings comply with the commitments. In other words, commitments have to be offered by the parties but the Commission may introduce conditions and obligations if they are required to ensure the enforceability of commitments. Meanwhile the scope to propose merger modifications and the level of discretion of the competition authority are quite different under the Law on Competition of the Republic of Lithuania, adopted almost two decades ago. The goal of this paper is to reveal those differences and, with the help of the jurisprudence of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania in the Gazprom case, to explain how this may impact future cases.

Authors and Affiliations

Dalia Višinskienė, Justina Nasutavičienė

Keywords

Related Articles

Can an Ideal Court Model in Private Antitrust Enforcement Be Established?

Any discussion of private antitrust enforcement usually focuses on substantive law and proceedings applicable to private antitrust cases. Those elements are important, however, the efficacy of both public and private enf...

What’s New in Western Balkans?.

Western Balkan jurisdictions (Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Macedonia (FYROM)) are often outside the focus of the competition community in the EU. This paper aims to rectify that, by providing an over...

Substantive and Procedural Issues of Cement Sector Investigations in Turkey

In 2016, the Turkish Competition Authority (hereinafter, TCA) published the Cement Sector Inquiry Report (hereinafter, Cement Sector Report) following more than two years of market analysis. One of the reasons...

2016 Amendment of the Czech Significant Market Power Act of 2009

he Significant Market Power Act (SMPA) adopted in 2009 regulates the assessment of, and the prevention of, the abuse of market power in the sale of agricultural and food products. The Act...

Consumer Welfare in Financial Services: A View from EU Competition Law

The paper analyses to what extent financial consumer protection forms part of the competition law objective of consumer welfare that EU competition law nowadays adheres to. It argues that while EU consumer law more gener...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP318454
  • DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.16.3
  • Views 82
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dalia Višinskienė, Justina Nasutavičienė (2017). The Gazprom Case: Lessons of the Past For the Future. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 10(16), 57-76. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-318454