THE GREATER MIDDLE EAST BETWEEN PROJECT AND REALITY

Journal Title: Impact Strategic - Year 2006, Vol 19, Issue 2

Abstract

Is the Greater Middle East both a concept and reality? How is confogurating this concept reported to reality? The concept, if we accept it as it is, only about a project, more or less to accomplish? In the globalization era and also fragmentation where is the use of this concept? Or if we speak about a reality how can it be identified in the large flow of realities which are fast succeeding around this inflexible and paradoxal world? And, now, above all, this world’s hot core, that conventionally represents the Middle East, can it be qualiffied as inflexible, stubborn, crises, and conflicts, terrorism generator and all kind of troubles which the civilized world is crying about more than is necessary? The paradox consists in the moving world inflexibillity context is a paradox in this wide region's inflexibillity context is a paradox? In other words, the Middle East is the cause for or the evils and harm of the Planet, or itself is a victim of the chaos state which the humanity passes through? This chaos state is an exclusive product of the Cold War or it has the origin in the enclosure concept, in a finite space often very narrow or very limited of the infinite Universe? From a wider perspective, “the new chaos”, released or, more exactly, expressed in the last decade of the past century, and understood as a disorganization for organization, leaves space for a new organizing, which could mean a new bipolarization, on a side being this “Greater Middle East” and, on the other side, the civilized world, especially The United States of America? Is the West looking for a new “enemy”, after it destroyed the communism, or is it trying to bring to the technological civilization level this remained bastion, here and there, kept in extremisms and prejudices hard to accept in a world full of interdependencies where the network philosophy and psysionogmy are in the first plan? What is given and what is refused in from this region?

Authors and Affiliations

Gheorghe VĂDUVA

Keywords

Related Articles

ENGLISH AS A NATO LANGUAGE AND THE LEVEL OF COMPETENCE

Due to the advancement in science and technology and to the increased use of computers and the Internet, English has become an international language that connects east and west. After WW II, English was used as a me...

ROMANIA – MODERATING THE POWER EQUILIBRIUM IN THE WIDER BLACK SEA REGION

A guiding principle in international relations for the past three centuries, the balance of power has become today a sub-systemic concept. Based on the analysis of the interests and the relations of power established...

A PROPOSAL CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INTERNATIONAL ENERGY LAW

Within this article, we are trying to establish the necessary legal premises for the creation of a legal body of regulations concerning exclusively the realm of energy and the energy activities, from the perspective...

TACTICAL BATTLE GROUPS - OPERATIONAL INSTRUMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN SECURITY STRATEGY

After the succes of Arthemis operation, that took place in the Republic of Congo in 2003, France, Germany and Great Britain proposed the building up of the battle groups, consisting of 1500 military, that could be deploy...

HUMAN SECURITY AND THE PHRASE “PARTNERSHIP FOR SECURITY” FOR NATO’S STRATEGIC CONCEPT

In 2010, NATO will issue a new strategic concept. After the fall of the “Berlin Wall”, NATO Strategic Concept dilute, conceptual and factual, the size of defense – in the development paradigm “security through cooperati...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP129039
  • DOI -
  • Views 77
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Gheorghe VĂDUVA (2006). THE GREATER MIDDLE EAST BETWEEN PROJECT AND REALITY. Impact Strategic, 19(2), 67-71. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-129039