THE IMPACT OF CENSORING AND FILTERING PRACTICES IN THE UKRAINIAN INTERNET ON UKRAINE’S INTERNATIONAL IMAGE IN CONTEXT OF RUSSIAN MILITARY AGGRESSION

Abstract

Despite the war, the process of Ukraine’s eurointegration continues and puts the country under tight scrutiny of Western NGO’s and international organizations, concerned with the state of Ukrainian civil society, democratic institutions and support of human rights, especially in the conflict zone. Such supervision extends itself beyond physical reality, as restrictive measures applied to Ukrainian cyberspace by Ukrainian authorities and unrecognized «governments» of the occupied territories are also scrutinized by relevant Western institutions that evaluate their impact on freedom of speech and accessibility of information for the citizens of Ukraine. Taking into account sheer quantity of censoring and filtering practices that are applied in the Ukrnet in the last four years, it is important to analyze the impact that such measures make on the international image of Ukraine. The most worrying trend is the relatively recent inclination of Ukrainian authorities to copy approaches of their adversaries when it comes to restriction of Internet freedom. The author believes that Ukrainian authorities should abandon the «tit for tat» approach and refrain from further engagement into fruitless competition with the Russian authorities and Russian proxies on «Whose list of blocked sites is bigger?» basis. It would be wise to limit the actual blocking initiatives to a handful of most prominent Russian Internet-corporations and some of Russian propaganda outlets. In other words, the emphasis should be put on promotion of Ukrainian channels of information, instead of restricting access to the Russian ones. In such a way Ukraine should be able to mitigate the negative impact that Russian subversive and restrictive tactics in the cyber space make on the country’s international image

Authors and Affiliations

M. M. Pervushyn

Keywords

Related Articles

Legal basis use wind and photovoltaic energy private households

In this paper the legal framework of exploitation the wind-power and photo-electrical energy converters in private households are analyzed. It was evaluated the order of electrical energy usage fabricated by renewable so...

Modern theories and concepts of religious dynamics: possibilities of appli- cation to Ukrainian realities

The article is dedicated to the comparative analysis of the basic theories and conceptions, referred to description of the state and prospects of society-religion interplay in modern societies. Such analysis is made from...

Administrative and procedural security of the intrusion on citizens’ rights on the secrecy of correspondence, telephone conversations, telegraphic and other correspondence

The article establishes the limits of administrative law norms regulatory influence sphere during the interference of the state with the citizens’ right to the secrecy of correspondence, telephone conversations, telegrap...

Peculiarities of universal legal mechanism of international cooperation in prevention of definite types of crimes (on the example of corruption)

Corruption is any course of action or failure to act by individuals or organizations, public or private, in violation of law or trust for profit or gain. Corruption affects all regions of the world and all levels of soci...

Electronic cabinet – a modern mechanism of interaction between the taxpayer and the state fiscal service

The article investigates the introduction by the state of alternative ways of the interaction of controlling bodies with taxpayers. Problems of the effectiveness of electronic interaction of controlling bodies with busin...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP658226
  • DOI -
  • Views 71
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

M. M. Pervushyn (2018). THE IMPACT OF CENSORING AND FILTERING PRACTICES IN THE UKRAINIAN INTERNET ON UKRAINE’S INTERNATIONAL IMAGE IN CONTEXT OF RUSSIAN MILITARY AGGRESSION. Вісник Національного технічного університету України “Київський політехнічний інститут”. Політологія. Соціологія. Право., 4(), 47-51. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-658226