The insured victim effect: When and why compensating harm decreases punishment recommendations
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2013, Vol 8, Issue 2
Abstract
An insurance policy may not only affect the consequences for victims but also for perpetrators. In six experiments we find that people recommend milder punishments for perpetrators when the victim was insured, although people believe that a sentence should not depend on the victim’s insurance status. The robustness of this effect is demonstrated by showing that recommendations can even be more lenient for crimes that are in fact more serious but in which the victim was insured. Moreover, even when harm was possible but did not materialize, people still prefer to punish crimes less severely when the (potential) victim was insured. The final two experiments suggest that the effect is associated with a change in (1) compassion for the victim and (2) perceived severity of the transgression. Implications of this phenomenon are briefly discussed.
Authors and Affiliations
Philippe P. F. M. van de Calseyde, Gideon Keren and Marcel Zeelenberg
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678050
- DOI -
- Views 108
- Downloads 0
Who says "larger" and who says "smaller"? Individual differences in the language of comparison
When comparing a pair of attribute values, English speakers can use a "larger" comparative ("A is larger/longer/higher/more than B") or a "smaller" comparative ("B is smaller/shorter/lower/less than A"). This choice matt...
Bullshit makes the art grow profounder
Across four studies participants (N = 818) rated the profoundness of abstract art images accompanied with varying categories of titles, including: pseudo-profound bullshit titles (e.g., The Deaf Echo), mundane titles (e....
Probability biases as Bayesian inference
In this article, I will show how several observed biases in human probabilistic reasoning can be partially explained as good heuristics for making inferences in an environment where probabilities have uncertainties assoc...
A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations
This paper proposes a revised version of the original Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale developed by Weber, Blais, and Betz (2002) that is shorter and applicable to a {broader range of ages, cultures, and educa...
Introducing upfront losses as well as gains decreases impatience in intertemporal choices with rewards
People tend to prefer smaller and sooner (SS) rewards over larger and later (LL) ones even when the latter are much larger. Previous research have identified several ways to enhance people’s patience. Adding to this lite...