The issue of authentic interpretation: current state of research

Abstract

Problem relates to the authentic interpretation not investigated in the domestic legal sci- ence and contains many contradictions. Authentic interpretation – a clarification of the legal act authorized subject to rulemaking, which he accepted. Authentic interpretation clarifies the content of regulations, is auxiliary and can’t be used separately from the legal act that is interpreted. The article analyzes the value of authentic interpretation of the rule-making. The author notes that a comparative analysis of rulemaking and legal interpretations proved that these types of legal interact and do not contradict each other, giving rise to some authors identify them. However, they have plenty of differences. Therefore, they identify unacceptable. The only rule which must comply with an authentic interpretation – it should not substitute rule- making. Authentic interpretation should not be carried out on the initiative of lawmaking bodies. Initiated legal interpretations can be executive authorities, courts (except the Constitutional Court of Ukraine), oversight agencies, local governments and other entities applying the law. It was concluded that at present the national parliament denied the right to perform authentic interpretation. However, can make authentic interpretation in Ukraine following subjects: the President of Ukraine, the Government and other executive bodies and local authorities. To address the need to develop an authentic interpretation of the Official interpretation Law, which provide the section “authentic interpretation”. This section should determine the definition of “authentic interpretation” of its borders, a comprehensive list of authentic inter- pretation and requirements of intercourse authentic interpretation.

Authors and Affiliations

Olha Kostyuk

Keywords

Related Articles

To the question about interpretation of concept “legal culture”

Studies by various authors on the issue of legal culture, is a considerable asset in the legal field and diversity of scientific research. Currently, the term «legal culture» is widely used by scientists, legislators, po...

Remote Work as a Form of Atypical Employment: Problems of Legal Regulation

Research of remote work as a legal category and mechanism of legal regulation of this form of atypical employment has extraordinary value at present complex social and econom- ic conditions of development of Ukraine. The...

ХХХІІІ International Historical and Legal Conference "Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: History and Development of Prospects" (to the 800th anniversary of the Grand Charter of Freedom)

ХХХІІІ International Historical and Legal Conference "Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: History and Development of Prospects" (to the 800th anniversary of the Grand Charter of Freedom)

Strategic Principles of the National Environmental Policy with respect to preserving rare and endangered species of wild animals (certain historic specifics and current condition)

The article explores the strategic principles of the state environmental policy of Ukraine, the National Environmental Policy of Ukraine regarding preserving rare and endangered spe- cies of wild animals, as defined in n...

M. P. Vasуlenko as the founder of the Ukrainian historical and legal science

The basis of the article posited the author’s report on the special general meeting of the Section of social and humanitarian Sciences of NAS of Ukraine on the occasion of the 150 anniversary of the birth of M. P. Vasуle...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP447447
  • DOI -
  • Views 71
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Olha Kostyuk (2016). The issue of authentic interpretation: current state of research. Правова держава. Щорічник наукових праць (Pravova derzhava), 27(), 562-568. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-447447