The issue of legal boundaries of the Moscow Patriarch according to the acts of the Council of Constantinople in 1593, the missive of the Patriarch Dionysius IV in 1686 and the 17th canon of the Forth Ecumenical Council

Journal Title: UNKNOWN - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue

Abstract

The article covers the topical question for the modern Orthodox society that is the issue of the legal boundaries of the Moscow Patriarchy. The question became especially acute being motivated by Ukraine temporality in achieving autocephaly of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. There is a tense dispute between Constantinople and Moscow – did Moscow get a right of jurisdiction over the Kyivan Metropolitanate that had initially been under the jurisdiction of Constantinople? The apologist for Moscow jurisdiction was priest Mikhail Zheltov, the Candidate of Theology. Nevertheless his fundamental and seemingly profound essay “Historical canonical bases for the unity of the Russian Church” was fairly disgraced by both secular scholars and specialists in ecclesiastic law, especially by canonist of Constantinople Patriarchy. However, pointing out weak points in Zheltov’s essay the critics also criticized the negation of canonicity of Moscow Patriarchy jurisdiction over the Kyivan Metropolitanate. Moreover, this article will prove demonstratively that disputable findings of father Mikhail do not mean that canonist of Constantinople have perfect arguments. The settlement of the question in scientific-canonical form has significant importance in overcoming the crisis between Constantinople and Moscow as well as in Ukrainian Orthodoxy divided into warring fractions like Ukrainian Orthodox Church, Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Kiev Patriarchy, and Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church.

Authors and Affiliations

Feognost Pushkov

Keywords

Related Articles

The description of morality and manners in Vsevolod Solovyov’s short prose

This article contains a genre specificity of short prose by Vsevolod Solovyov, whose work is devoted to the Russian history between the 18th and 19th centuries. According to professor N.L. Vershinina, the author distingu...

Traumatisation of the past: methodology of research and main approaches

The article considers the main directions of the analysis of collective trauma, psychological and sociological. On the basis of studying modern domestic literature on the issue of collective trauma the author comes to a...

The classification of English biotechnological terminology

The classification of English biotechnological terminology is proposed in the article. The author identifies the main groups of terms referring to general scientific, basic and proper terminology that have emerged within...

Peculiarities of organization of spiritual and educational activities of religious denomination in Chernivtsi region

On the basis of archival sources and materials the attempt is made to trace and analyse the implementation of process of spiritual enlightenment in Chernivtsi region in the first two decades of Ukraine independence, with...

Cult of icons in the 19th – early 20th centuries: social aspect (on the materials of the European North of Russia)

The article considers the significance of the icon-worshiping phenomenon in the religious life of the European North of Russia. The main attention is paid to the control over the distribution of icons, carried out mainly...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP442996
  • DOI -
  • Views 104
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Feognost Pushkov (2018). The issue of legal boundaries of the Moscow Patriarch according to the acts of the Council of Constantinople in 1593, the missive of the Patriarch Dionysius IV in 1686 and the 17th canon of the Forth Ecumenical Council. UNKNOWN, 4(), 14-14. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-442996