The Khrushchev reforms: liberalization of the political system or an attempt to build a civil society? (the example of Ukrainian SSR)

Journal Title: Eminak - Year 2016, Vol 1, Issue 2

Abstract

Khrushchev reforms were directed at leaving the country from the excesses of the Stalin era by reforming the political and socioeconomic system in the country. However, document analysis and study of the situation give reason to assume that in those years in fact there was a gradual formation of civil society. Instead simultaneously took place liberalization of internal party life, government agencies, institutions and organizations in the public sphere. However the efforts of then government showed illusory way of communist doctrine of building a new society. An outstanding feature of era was the attempt to raise primarily the production activity of the Komsomol and trade unions, as well as involvement in the management structures of the nonparty «asset», mainly among young people. For ordinary citizens this course often interpreted as a concrete practice of creating real foundations of communist society. The ruling nomenclature takes another position in view of the dangerous situation for her. In the article on the situation in the Ukrainian SSR revealed problems of definite process and highlights the diverse range of attempts to solve their by proven administrative methods. The author outlined the organizational principles and methods of party cadres and state. The main focus of this activity was to provide the necessary power directing the course of events. It is about results and consequences of de-Stalinization in the course, reforming the political system of the postwar era. The author describes the activities of the ruling nomenklatura, which it influence on the development of features of future society. In the article used as a public archive documents and materials from public repositories as well as information of periodicals, testimonies of participants of events and scientific literature mainly Ukrainian and Russian researchers. Attempts to «improve» a totalitarian society was doomed because of his inability to accept the objective a true democracy and efforts to maintain one-party governance, based on communist principles

Authors and Affiliations

Petro Kyrydon

Keywords

Related Articles

The latest «Zaporizhian Sich» in foreign land (creation of paramilitary structures in Ukrainian camp Rastatt in 1916)

Ukrainianization three camps prisoners from the imperial army in Germany was an important milestone in the development of Ukrainian independent movement, which at that time was able to deploy just outside Ukraine. Ukrain...

The economic factor in international security Ukraine: history and modernity

The article highlights the issue of formation of economic relations of Ukraine in terms of economic security. Analyzes the major events of the early 90th years, which have led to a special issue of mainstreaming economic...

Red Cross posters as basic agitation means in the conditions of battle actions

In the article the question of the use of posters of Red Cross considered as basic agitation means in the conditions of battle actions. In particular, accents are done in the years of Second World War and shown problems...

Taras Shevchenko and Mykola Mikhnovsky – Founding Fathers of Modern Idea of Ukraine’s Independent Statehood

One of the most intriguing aspects of perceiving global and local social and historic processes for researchers is to identify a set of causes that triggers social activity and prompts particular communities or even popu...

The formation of the alcohol industry in the Ukrainian lands

Production of ethyl alcohol in the Russian Empire, which included Ukrainian lands, began in the XV century. The formation of the alcohol industry was more intense after the peasant reform of 1861, due to the state intere...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP226251
  • DOI -
  • Views 222
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Petro Kyrydon (2016). The Khrushchev reforms: liberalization of the political system or an attempt to build a civil society? (the example of Ukrainian SSR). Eminak, 1(2), 76-80. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-226251