THE KING-DEVICK TEST: AN INDICATOR OF LONGER-TERM COGNITIVE EFFECTS POST-CONCUSSION

Journal Title: Acta Neuropsychologica - Year 2015, Vol 13, Issue 3

Abstract

Background: The King-Devick test (K-D) was introduced in 2011 as a quick, easy and cost-effective way to screen for a concussion. Relying on differences in visual scanning between a baseline and post-injury examination to discern a concussion, the test has been found to be sensitive to concussions immediately (within minutes) following injury. The aim of this paper was to determine whether the K-D is sensitive to residual effects of a concussion.Material/Methods: Performance on the K-D was compared in a sample of 13 subjects tested 1-60 days after a concussion and 17 matched non-concussed controls. We also compared subjects’ performances on standard neuropsychological measures of convergent validity (attention, working memory and processing speed) and discriminant validity (IQ and motor speed).Results: Consistent with hypotheses, concussed subjects performed worse on the K-D than non-concussed subjects. K-D performance was correlated with tests that measured attention and processing speed, but was unrelated to estimated IQ. There was a trend for subjects with a prior history of concussion to perform worse on the K-D than subjects for whom this was their first concussion.Conclusions: These results provide initial support for convergent and criterion validity of the K-D as a measure of attention and processing speed that is sensitive to persisting effects of concussion.

Authors and Affiliations

John Bernstein, Laura Mitchell, Jeffrey Bazarian

Keywords

Related Articles

LIVING IN THE PAST: THE NEUROTIC PERSONALITY

The basic function of personality is to enable the individual to adapt to the anticipated state of affairs. In order for this to be successful, it is necessary to maintain an orientation toward the future. This requires,...

INCREASED LEVELS OF INTERLEUKIN-10 EXPRESSION COMPARED TO INTERLEUKIN-6 IN LEUKOCYTES OF HEALTHY SUBJECTS. COULD IT BE USEFUL IN THE FUTURE OF THE DEPRESSION DIAGNOSIS?

It is a well known, that the physical activity promotes mental health. Physically active people relatively rarely suffer from psychosomatic and depressive disorders. It is possible that the differences in gene activity i...

STRATEGIES OF MEMORIZATION AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE LEARNING PROCESS AMONG INDIVIDUALS WITH BORDERLINE INTELLECTUAL FUNCTIONING

Borderline Intellectual Functioning (BIF), or borderline intelligence, is defined as an intelligence quotient from 1.01 to 2.00 standard deviations below average, that is, a level between average intelligence and intelle...

PROCESS PSYCHOLOGY, NEUROLOGY, AND THE SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY OF MIND

This paper begins with a brief survey of the microgenetic process thoughtof Jason Brown as it has developed from its neuropsychological inception tohis more recent neurophilosophy. We then survey some of the argumentsand...

THE PROBLEM OF ANOREXIA NERVOSA DIAGNOSIS: A CASE STUDY

Background: Studies point out to the fact that 62% of people with eating disorders, before they turn up at a psychiatrist’s, are treated by a gastroenterologist or general practitioner, 46% of them take drugs improving t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP77297
  • DOI -
  • Views 122
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

John Bernstein, Laura Mitchell, Jeffrey Bazarian (2015). THE KING-DEVICK TEST: AN INDICATOR OF LONGER-TERM COGNITIVE EFFECTS POST-CONCUSSION. Acta Neuropsychologica, 13(3), 229-236. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-77297