THE LEGAL REGIME OF UNFAIR CLAUSES IN COMPARATIVE LAW

Abstract

The concept of unfair clauses has legitimately held the headlines in recent European case law and its relevance is due to the innovative case law solutions and due to the increasing volume of legal contractual relationships which may be considered as being under the legal regime of abusive clauses. The purpose of this article is to analyse unfair clauses in countries with a long history in consumer law, by comparing the manner in which these clauses are stipulated and what each state deems to be unfair. Also, the author’s study is aimed to outline the legal solutions identified by the foreign legislator in comparison with the ones established by the Romanian legislator with respect to unfair consumer clauses. This study is also directed towards emphasizing the necessity of amending the current legal framework regulating abusive clauses, since current technological developments are susceptible of creating situations where the consumer is unlikely to be guarded from a legal point of view. For example, even though contracts concluded online are highly frequent nowadays, consumer protection is still directed towards more classic contracts and is unable to provide for relevant liability in cases when the consumer is subject to intelligent agents acting in cyber space. In particular, the usual lists of clauses deemed as abusive does not reflect and are not exactly applicable to cases when the consumer orders a product or a service through online platforms and therefore, the legal framework must be amended in accordance with common cases usually encountered in today’s modern reality.

Authors and Affiliations

Gabriel VASII

Keywords

Related Articles

INVENTORY OF PUBLIC GOODS. CURRENT REGULATION AND NORMATIVE PERSPECTIVES

The Romanian Constitution of 1991, revised in 2003, does not explicitly regulate the notion of a public domain. The core of the regulation of this notion is found in several normative acts regarding the land fund, the lo...

SHORT REFLECTIONS REGARDING PRECAUTIONARY AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES ORDERED IN THE CRIMINAL TRIAL AGAINST AN INSOLVENT LEGAL PERSON

The judicial realities have shown us that the field of the precautionary and preventive measures ruled in the criminal trial against the insolvent judicial person is not correctly and efficiently regulated. There are a s...

THE FREE MOVEMENT OF JUDGMENTS AND JUDICIAL DECISIONS

EU substantive law is based on a system of circulation freedoms which encompasses the idea that the Union, its internal market or other areas of legal rule, such as the area of freedom, security and justice are, above al...

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CARGO INSURANCE CONTRACT IN CASE OF INTERNATIONAL LAND TRANSPORT

Cargo international transport is an engine for the development of the economic relations between states involving cross-border movement of goods through the crossing of at least one border of a state (international trans...

SOME ISSUES CONCERNING JURISDICTION ON CLAIMS FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF FOR INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

The article deals with some issues surrounding the assertion of jurisdiction on claims for preliminary or provisional relief for infringement of intellectual property rights in Romania. Starting with the sources of the n...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP303607
  • DOI -
  • Views 132
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Gabriel VASII (2018). THE LEGAL REGIME OF UNFAIR CLAUSES IN COMPARATIVE LAW. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 10(12), 336-340. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-303607