The liability of kinship group (‘Aqilah) in a different perspective
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2015, Vol 47, Issue 101
Abstract
Reputable Imami jurisprudents believe that liability for involuntary manslaughter (wergild or diyah) is incumbent upon the institution called ‘Āqilah (paternal kinship group of the criminal). From the very beginning, the verdict has faced challenges, including its conflict with the principle of individual criminal responsibility, which have prompted jurisprudents to offer various justifications so as to explain its reasons. Based on Qur’anic rules, generalities and predications and using the Jawahiri approach (fiqh al-Jawāhirī), the present article seeks to prove the belief that despite the opposition of Shaykh al-Mufīd, this idea is not founded on consensus. In addition, major famous documents pertaining to this notion are the hadiths where serious doubts exist with regard to their documentations and connotations; moreover, they stand in contrast to the Qur’anic generalities and predications and also to independent reason. The narrative or Hadith evidences which have remained undisputed and without opposition necessarily prove the liability of kinship group only in cases where the ‘Āqilah is responsible for the supervision and care of a person’s life, or is formally held accountable.
Authors and Affiliations
Mohsen Ahmadvand, Hossein Naseri Moghadam
Examination of the Concept of Ta‘līl (Causal Inference)
What is meant by ta‘līl is that if in a reason the cause of the judgment has been mentioned, the denial of the judgment can been concluded from the lack of that judgment; in such a way that from the denial of restriction...
Reciprocal duties and rights of owner and usurper after delivering the alternate of usurped property
Alternate of the usurped property is a compensation paid to the owner after unavailability of usurped property. The Iranian Civil Code, following the Islamic scholars' famous view, has principally accepted the payment of...
Revisiting the authority of “alidjma almadraki” (idjma with known origins)
Non-authority of “alidjma almadraki” (idjma with known origins) is a topic frequently raised in the Usulis’ contemporary literature. In this paper, the authority of “alidjma almadraki” has been studied through revisiting...
A New Look at Mawlawī (Legislative) and Irshādī (Advisory) and their Methodological Resultant
After determining the status of mawlawī and irshādī and deciding that they are attributes of commands and prohibitions and not attributes of ruling and after giving the opted definition and its advantage over other defin...
A Research concerning the Principles of the Right for Human Dignity in Sources of Rules
Human dignity is examinable at least in three fields: human dignity, Divine dignity, and socio-conventional dignity. In this article, due to time limits, we have only dealt with a part of what can be presented about dign...