THE LIABILITY OF THE PHD CANDIDATE AND OF THE MEMBERS OF THE DOCTORATE PUBLIC SUSTENANCE COMMISSION FOR INFRINGEMENTS OF DEONTOLOGY RULES IN THE ACTIVITY OF THESIS ELABORATION
Journal Title: Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ) - Year 2018, Vol 10, Issue 12
Abstract
The present paper proposes an analysis of the liability of PhD candidates and members of the doctorate commission for infringements of the deontology and ethics of the elaboration of a PhD thesis. In last years, Romania toughened the control over the compliance of PhD researchers and the professors monitoring this compliance with the rules of deontology and ethics of scientific research accomplished in the process of formulating the doctorate thesis. These legal standards are regulated mainly by Law on National Education no. 1/2011 and Government Decision no. 681/2011for the approval of the Code on PhD Studies. This kind of control passes many filters inside the university organising the doctoral studies but also an extern evaluation conceived in two rounds, one before the conferral of the PhD title and another afterwards, by the National Council on Attestation of Titles, Diplomas and University Certificates (CNATDCU). The form of liability of PhD candidates when infringing deontology rules in the process of elaboration of doctorate thesis is mainly disciplinary, though in certain cases could be based upon non-compliance with the contractual obligations. The liability of the doctorate commission members is predominantly administrative-disciplinary and in some specific situations based on the law of torts. The study compares the Romanian model of regulation of the matter with the legal provisions on the same topic from France, Italy and the United Kingdom. Reference are made on the role of the state organisms on research evaluation, such as CNATDCU (in Romania), Hcéres (in France), UKRIO (in the United Kingdom) and ANVUR (in Italy).
Authors and Affiliations
Gheorghe BOCȘAN
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP305654
- DOI -
- Views 126
- Downloads 0
SUBSTITUTION OF PARENTAL CONSENT WHEN MINORS TRAVEL ABROAD: SANCTION OR REMEDY?
Decisions on establishment of minors' place of residence fall within the sphere of application of joint parental authority, along with decisions concerning the form of education and professional training, complex medical...
PRACTICAL ASPECTS REGARDING THE CLAIM FOR THE ANNULMENT OF THE RESOLUTIONS OF THE GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS, FROM A SUBSTANTIAL AND PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE
The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief analysis of the legal framework regarding the procedural and substantial dispositions governing the claim for the annulment of the resolutions of the general meeting of sha...
ISSUES OF CONTROVERSIAL PRACTICE REFERRING TO THE CRIME OF FALSE TESTIMONY
The crime of false testimony is one of the crimes which are traditionally found in our criminal legislation, the judicial practice recording also specific situations which required the application of the incrimination te...
THE ROLE OF THE PRESIDENCY IN THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ROMANIAN PRESIDENCY OF THE EU COUNCIL - CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
This year, for the first time in the history of its membership in the European Union, Romania exercises the rotating presidency of the Council of the European Union. As far as the Council is concerned, it is undoubtedly...
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF REALIZATION OF THE RIGHT OF PERSONAL PROTECTION OF THE ACCUSED IN THE CONTEXT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TERM FOR PRE-TRIAL INVESTIGATION ACCORDING TO THE BULGARIAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE.
The present scientific publication represents an attempt for clarification the question, how affects the principle of objective truth and the right of personal protection of the accused person to carry out the pre-trial...