THE LIMITS OF THE ANTI-RELIGIOUS DISCOURSE IN THE SECOND REPUBLIC OF POLAND. THE REMARKS ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT VERDICT OF THE 5TH JULY 1938 AND THE RELEVANCE OF THE JUDGMENT TODAY
Journal Title: Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego - Year 2010, Vol 13, Issue 13
Abstract
The jurisdiction of the Supreme court in the interwar period was characterized by the high substantive level, and was often based on the multifaceted comparisons of the normative states in the legislature ranges. Not all decrees, however, were issued with equal care for details. One of the decrees, which ought to be re-examined, is the Supreme Court verdict of 5th July 1938, in which the Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Court of Second Instance, finding the accused guilty on the basis of article 174 of the Penal Code.: “Whoever blasphemes against God is to be convicted to up to five years of prison.” The accused had translated a book by a French thinker, undermining the divinity of Christ. The use of words like “lout” or “brawler” was considered a blasphemy. There are at least two mistakes in the reasoning of the Supreme Court. Firstly, it had not been clarified whether a translator, following the premises of his profession, committed the crime of helping or, having recognized the translation as a separate work on the basis of the copyright law, committed a crime completely different than that of the French author. Secondly, the attempt of mutual balancing the principles of religious equality and the freedom of speech had not been conducted. The Supreme Court verdict, which could be expressed in a better way, met the social need for justice. After reading the decree one may infer that the verdict convicting the accused was seemingly the only right verdict, irrespectively of the argumentation provided during the trial. Regardless of the mistakes, according the contemporary Penal Code (article 196), the main idea standing behind that Supreme Court verdict remains relevant up to nowadays: Polish legislature does not prohibit the speeches not complying with religion or even denying God’s existence, as long as the speeches are not blasphemous, that is their authors do not speak against God in insulting terms, do not “violate the worship that is to be paid to God” by means of an insult (…), contempt, despise and other affronts.
Authors and Affiliations
Maciej Mikuła
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP103267
- DOI -
- Views 211
- Downloads 0
THE BUDGETARY CONSEQUENCES OF NON-DIRECT SUPPORT OF RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS FROM PUBLIC FUNDS IN POLAND
The financing of churches and other religious associations is an important component of the system of legal and customary regulations comprising the model of Church-State relationships in modern states and being a focal...
THE RELIGIOUS FORM OF CIVIL MARRIAGE CONTRACTION AND THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY OF RELIGIOUS DENOMINATIONS
According to the current law religious denominations in Poland may exercise their rights in accordance with the principle of equality regardless of the form in which their legal status is regulated. The catalogue of righ...
MIEJSCE DUSZPASTERSTWA WIĘZIENNEGO WE FRANCUSKIM SYSTEMIE PENITENCJARNYM
Artykuł składa się zasadniczo z dwóch części. Pierwsza dotyczy zagadnień teoretycznych francuskiego duszpasterstwa więziennego, druga zaś - praktyki realizowanej w regionie marsylskim. We wstępie autor przybliża zagadni...
CHURCH JURISDICTIONAL FRAGMENTATION, RELIGIOUS DISCOURSE AND PUBLIC POLICY: THE GREEK CASE
The paper aims at exploring the question whether the Greek State has exploited the jurisdictional fragmentation of the Orthodox Church in order to promote its secular agenda. The paper argues that the so-called ‘identity...
POWSTANIE POLSKIEGO ZWIĄZKU KATOLICKO-SPOŁECZNEGO
Idea katolicyzmu społecznego w sposób dynamiczny rozwijała się w Polsce przed drugą wojną światową. W okresie powojennym komunistyczne władze PRL dążyły do całkowitego usunięcia z życia politycznego i państwowego wszelki...