The Notion of Possessions for the Purposes of Article 1 of the First Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights

Journal Title: Проблеми законності - Year 2016, Vol 132, Issue 132

Abstract

Article 1 of the First Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter – Art. P1-1) states that every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. Thus in order for this article to be applicable, the applicant has to show that the right, which he alleges to be violated by the respondent state, constitutes his possession. The concept of “possessions” within Art. P1-1 was analyzed by foreign scholars, such as S. Drooghenbroeck, U. Kriebaum, C. Schreurer, L. Sermet and others. The problem was also addressed by the Judge of Constitutional Court of Ukraine – S. Shevchuk. The main objective of the paper is to provide general criteria of what should be deemed as possession in the context of Art. P1-1. The case law of European Court of Human Rights allows to conclude that in order to be deemed as a possession, the subjective right in question should meet three following requirements: (1) it must have pecuniary value, which can be measured in money; (2) it must be civil in nature (as distinct from rights based on public law); (3) it must be certain enough to be enforced by the court (in contrast to the mere hope of some advantages). Conclusions of the research. As a conclusion it should be noted that in its pursuit to protect fundamental rights of a person European Court of Human Rights tends to equate legal notion of possessions with economic concept of welfare.

Authors and Affiliations

Богдан Карнаух

Keywords

Related Articles

State agriculture policy of Ukraine on sustainable development of rural areas: legal aspects

One of the components of the state agricultural policy of Ukraine is to ensure sustainable rural development, which the international community recognized the existence of a strategy for the XXI century. The author found...

Оптимизация тактических решений: субъективная и объективная обусловленность

Рассмотрены субъективные и объективные факторы, влияющие на оптимизацию тактических решений. Приведены «психологические ловушки», имеющие место при принятии решений, адаптированные к различным следственным ситуациям. Наз...

Disadvantages of legal engineering of the disclosure of certain norms of the Budget Code of Ukraine

On June 21, 2001, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted the Basic Law defining the principles of the budgetary system of Ukraine – the Budget Code of Ukraine. However, till now unregulated norms of separate articles of t...

Взаємодія кримінально-виконавчої інспекції з поліцією щодо отримання інформації про притягнення засудженого до адміністративної та кримінальної відповідальності

Розглядаються шляхи удосконалення організації взаємодії кримінально-виконавчої інспекції з органами поліції з приводу надання на засудженого, звільненого від відбування покарання з випробуванням, інформації про притягнен...

Особенности деятельности субъектов публичной администрации в сфере публичных финансов

Освещены особенности деятельности субъектов публичной администрации в сфере публичных финансов: это определенным образом согласованная и организованная система органов; субъектом есть государство в лице органов государст...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP175434
  • DOI 10.21564/2414-990x.132.59090
  • Views 126
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Богдан Карнаух (2016). The Notion of Possessions for the Purposes of Article 1 of the First Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights. Проблеми законності, 132(132), 205-214. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-175434