The Paradox of Absolute Nonexistent and its Parallel Propositions
Journal Title: جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام - Year 2008, Vol 40, Issue 81
Abstract
The misconception (shubha) of absolute nonexistent – which we have named as paradox – is not an amusing brainteaser; rather, it is one the significant epistemological issues. Its importance can be looked upon from two different viewpoints: research and educational. It is significant from the research viewpoint because it challenges propositions which constitute the foundation of our thinking and knowledge, propositions such as impossibility of contradiction, vicious circle, and endless chain. It is also significant from the educational viewpoint, since it has been dealt with in the two widely used texts Bidāya and Niḥāya, albeit very briefly. This very brevity and succinctness has been misleading so as it has put the philosophy students into difficulty and confusion and prompted some of the eminent contemporary philosophy researchers to accuse the author of these books as having uttered ramblings. For many years this issue has confounded the minds of many of the intellectuals and challenged them to try to find a solution for it. Ṣadr al-Muti’allihīn Shīrāzī (Mullā Ṣadrā) – the greatest intellectual of all ages and the unrivalled genius – has dealt with this paradox and the similar propositions in his unique treasure, Asfār, and proposed some solutions which can be traced back to the writings of others, as well. In this article, I first made a study of the background of the paradox of absolute nonexistent and delved into the paradoxes parallel to it in nature and destiny, and then clarified Mullā Ṣadrā's responses by exploring his words and indicated that he has given two responses in solving this paradox. Next, in light of these responses, I proceeded to reappraise ‘Allāma Ṭabāṭabā’ī (ra)'s words in order to reveal that, although succinct and ambiguous, his words are far from being labeled as rambling. Finally, after giving a report and assessment of post-Mullā Ṣadrā researches, I picked out one of his two responses, as well as a solution by one of the intellectuals preceding him, which with certain rephrasing and restructuring, I regarded as qualified.
Authors and Affiliations
Mahdī ‘AẓīMī
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP202424
- DOI 10.22067/philosophy.v40i2.3170
- Views 152
- Downloads 0
An Analytical and Critical Look at the Concept of Logos from the Ancient Greek to the Church Fathers
The concept of Logos is seen figuratively before Christianity in ancient Greek philosophy and Judaism (Old Testament and some works of Filon of Alexandria). In ancient Greek philosophy, Logos is counted as the first prin...
Emanation of Multiplicity from Unity from the Transcendental Philosophy Point of View (On the Basis of Gradational and Particular Unity)
Explanation of the Multiplicity of the world and the way it was created from the beginning of existence is one the concerns of philosophers, including Mullā Ṣadrā. The discourse of the emanation of multiplicity from unit...
The Quiddity and Existence of Matter
Belief in matter of matters or the prime matter is one of the earliest human beliefs in the field of philosophical thinking. From among the Muslim philosophers, the peripatetics have confirmed it and come up with certain...
Muṭahharī and the Neo-Religious Thinking
Neo-religious (Islamic) thinkers have frequently dealt with the issue of decline and revival of Islamic civilization and are thereby engaged in tradition and modernity. They have adopted two different approaches in confr...
Examining the boundaries and criteria for exaggeration and degradation from the views of Allameh Majlesi and Sheikh Mufid
The present study aims to examine the boundaries and criteria for exaggeration and degradation from the views of Allameh Majlesi and Sheikh Mufid. Both theologians have referred to similar notions as limits and criteria...