THE POWER OF A SYMBOL
Journal Title: Вісник Черкаського університетету. Серія Філософія - Year 2016, Vol 1, Issue 1
Abstract
The question "What is character?" has long discussed in philosophy. As a result, there are two types of concepts about character. According to one of these ideas symbol corresponds harmonious reality (positive concept). According to another – the idea of a character refers to fragmented, chaotic reality (negative concept). There have been attempts to create a theory of character that would conflict of concepts. The purpose of this work is to explore the power of a character from a philosophical point of view, to prove that the character has real power over the individual and society as a whole. Methods. This paper was used the methods of analysis and synthesis. Analysis of recent studies has shown that the psychologists and psychiatrists (Freud, Jung, Fromm) were first, who talking about power of the character. There are contemporary works that focus on particular character authorities a certain society. Some philosophers even identify the character and a power. So the question of power symbol in the philosophy remains open. Results. The symbol can be terrible destructive force. Symbols are the carrier sense dictates that history, human memory. Not every accident occurs as destruction of cultural destruction memory. The individual, attributing itself to a particular group, it selects based on their own ideas about a good and an evil, a honor and a dishonor, a fame and a shame. A symbol is a sign of solidarity with this group. The symbol may be involved in the semiotic connections: it can insult or praise. The symbolic world is protecting people from their existential fears and uncertainty. There are formed two opposing camps; each of them by protecting certain characters defends its identity. The originality of this work lies in the fact that is considered the power of a symbol as a philosophical category in her determined features of formation of the government. Conclusion. Thus it can be concluded that the symbol is two-faced Janus. One with sides, the characters appear in the capable hands as a means of manipulating the masses, and with holds that dictates standards of conduct and the impact on people's lives with different. In this case, the symbolic power is a power regulator of human behavior, character over the minds of people. The symbolic power has influence on the individual and society as a whole.
Authors and Affiliations
Hanna FANDEJEVA
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP177545
- DOI -
- Views 113
- Downloads 0
THE SEMIOTIC MODEL OF COMMUNICATION AND THE REASONING ON THE EXAMPLE OF ONLINE-GAME IN FACEBOOK NETWORK
Introduction. The analysis of a new sign system functioning, viz. Internet and Social Networks, suggests a large number of issues. The purpose of the paper is to consider the features of the new semiotic model of communi...
DISCOURSE AS A SOCIO-CULTURAL PHENOMENON
Introduction. The article deals with the problem of discourse. The main trends of the doctrine of the discourse in historical perspective have been considered. It has been shown that the realities of modern life are the...
THE ESSENCE AND MEANING OF TRUST IN EDUCATION
Introduction. The structure of cognitive relations the person joins and their result are defined by the openness of cognitive space. The aspect of openness and accessibility factors is pointed out from the challenging sc...
Philosophical category of «time» in the space of fashion.
The place of philosophical category of «time» in the space of fashion is considered. The retrospective of ontological foundations of time in various forms of fashion is observed. Attention on Greek etymology of concept «...
FROM STANDARTIZATION TO CREATIVITY: IMPLICATION OF THE IDEAS AND VIEWS OF KEN ROBINSON IN UKRAINIAN EDUCATION
Introduction. Modern Ukrainian education is in a state of reform. A number of changes in the educational field concerned with the search for adequate responses to civilization challenges, the necessity of overcoming syst...