The Practical Philosophy of Al-Fārābī and Avicenna: A Comparison
Journal Title: Nazariyat İslam Felsefe ve Bilim Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi - Year 2019, Vol 5, Issue 1
Abstract
This article compares the approaches to practical philosophy of the two most significant Muslim philosophers of the classical period, al-Fārābī (d. 950) and Ibn Sīnā (d. 1037). Initially, I will examine their classification of the practical sciences and show their formal differences, and then question whether these differences point to a fundamental disagreement about the source of practical knowledge. One of my conclusions is that al-Fārābī clearly separated the intellectual and independent concept of practical philosophy from the religious sciences, whereas Ibn Sīnā’s standpoint is religious-based, dependent, and partially covered by Islamic jurisprudence. As the latter emphasizes these various points in separate passages about the source of practical knowledge, a holistic and illustrative combination of these passages is required. Thus, by citing and discussing all of these passages, I suggest that Ibn Sīnā not only accepted the prophetic legislation of the practical sciences, but also provided an epistemological background that makes it possible to take account of the earlier Greek and Muslim moral philosophers’ legacy. Finally, I also point out that the main reason for these philosophers’ differences over practical philosophy is their disagreement about the relation between religion and philosophy.
Authors and Affiliations
Hümeyra Özturan
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP603948
- DOI 10.12658/Nazariyat.5.1.M0071en
- Views 164
- Downloads 0
The Problem of Periodization in Sufi Studies: The Struggle of Sufism to Become a Discipline Between the Religious Sciences and Metaphysics
The periodization of sciences is one of the essential devices of treating a field by specification and tracing the transformations in that field. Nonetheless, it would be hard to speak of robust periodization concerning...
Abu al-Barakat al-Baghdadi and His Use of Ibn Sina‘s al-Hikma al-‘Arudiyya (or another work closely related to it) in the Logical Part of His Kitab al-Mu‘tabar
The last four sections of the first book of Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī’s summa, entitled Kitāb al-Mu‘tabar, deal with dialectics, sophistical refutations, rhetoric, and poetics in full line with Aristotle’s Organon. Howe...
Quests for a General Method to Solve the Equations of High Degree in the History of Islamic Mathematics: The Case of Irshad al-tullab ila ‘ilm al-hisab
This article introduces a book titled Irshād al-tullāb ilā ‘ilm al-hisāb, written by an anonymous author who most probably lived in Ottoman lands, presented the book to Ottoman Sultan Bayezid II. In the epilogue of the b...
A Mathematical Analysis of the Theory of Horizontal Sundials in the Ottoman Period: The Case of Risalah of Ruhama
As the prayer times are determined according the sun’s position, the theory of sundials, how to draw and design them, hold a significant place in the history of Islamic astronomy. All Muslim scientists working on applied...
Conquering the Time: An Example of a Manual for Making an Astrolabe Quadrant: Muhammad Qunawı’s Hadiyyat al-muluk
Perhaps the most fruitful and valuable outcome of the advancements in astronomy that occurred in the Muslim world is the extraordinary development of instrumentation. With the application of trigonometry on a higher leve...