The preprint debate: What are the issues?

Journal Title: Medical Journal Armed Forces - Year 2018, Vol 74, Issue 2

Abstract

The debate surrounding preprints is increasing. Preprint proponents claim that preprints are a way to shore up trust in academic publishing, that they provide an additional 'quality' screen prior to traditional peer review, that they can assist with the replication crisis plaguing science in part by making negative or contradictory results public, and that they speed up the publishing process because fundamental results can be presented early, serving as timely reports for the purposes of tenure or grant funding. Preprint skeptics and critics claim that preprints may represent a risk and a danger to quality-based academic publishing because they are documents that have not been carefully and thoroughly vetted prior to their release into the public domain. Thus, academics who cite invalid, poorly vetted, or false facts could cause harm, not unlike the unscholarly 'predatory' open access movement. Feedback on work from lesser-known groups, or on less glamorous topics, may be null or worse than from traditional peer review, annulling an initial key objective of preprints. Although there is no widespread empirical evidence or data yet regarding some of these issues, academics should be aware of the ideological, financial, and political tug-of-war taking place before deciding if they wish to publish their important findings as a preprint prior or simultaneous to submitting to a regular journal for peer review.

Authors and Affiliations

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

Keywords

Related Articles

Functional outcome after arthroscopic management of traumatic recurrent dislocation shoulder using Bankart repair and Remplissage techniques

Background: Recurrent dislocation shoulder is one of the common shoulder injuries encountered by the orthopedic surgeon in clinical practice. Bankart repair using the arthroscopic method has become one of the standard te...

Solitary pulmonary nodule: An interesting clinical mimicry of pulmonary tuberculosis

Pulmonary histoplasmosis is regarded as an opportunistic/ saprophytic respiratory infection caused by a low pathogenic fungus and can be seen in both immunocompetent and immunosuppressed individuals. Histoplasma spreads...

Nasal myiasis by Chrysomya bezziana

Myiasis is a pathogenic condition found in live humans and animals caused by various species of dipteran larvae. Chrysomya bezziana, also known as old world screwworm, is an obligate parasite in mammals and is known to i...

An observational study on the effects of aviation turbine fuel and lubricants on the skin of Indian Air Force ground crew in flying stations

Background: Ground crew of the Air Force routinely handle aviation turbine fuel (ATF) and lubricants and a need was felt to study the adverse effects of these substances on their skin so that remedial measures could be t...

The preprint debate: What are the issues?

The debate surrounding preprints is increasing. Preprint proponents claim that preprints are a way to shore up trust in academic publishing, that they provide an additional 'quality' screen prior to traditional peer revi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP647049
  • DOI 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.08.002
  • Views 46
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva (2018). The preprint debate: What are the issues?. Medical Journal Armed Forces, 74(2), 162-164. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-647049