THE REFLECTION OF PROCEDURAL GUILT IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PROVISIONS. LIABILITY FOR UNJUST CONDEMNATION OR FOR TAKING PREVENTIVE MEASURES UNLAWFULLY
Journal Title: Challenges of the Knowledge Society - Year 2013, Vol 3, Issue 0
Abstract
In the criminal proceedings of some law states the wrongful sentencing of individuals is very rare, having a comprehensive system of procedural safeguards which prevent such a situation. The purpose of the criminal proceedings is to punish only the culprits, the Criminal Procedure code frontispiece being stated the idea that no innocent person should be held criminally liable. By achieving this aspect of purpose is ensured observance of legality and the rule of law. All the basic rules and the whole organization of the criminal trial are polarized around this major goal of justice. Also the professional qualification level of those summoned to administer criminal justice in the modern state to minimizes the risk of judiciar miscarriages. The deep humanism of our law requires though the regulation of those procedural arrangements, through which in the event of an act of injustice, the wrongly convicted is able to obtain prompt repairs that society owes them. A very important aspect related to the evolution over time of the regulation of this institution, is that in its doctrine of integration in the European Union, Romania has adopted a series of laws and regulations designed to ensure our legislation’s alignment with the relevant legislation of the countries from the European community and to ensure the compliance with the European Convention on Human Rights. This process is still ongoing, therefore the establishment and the subsequent modification of the special procedure concerning the remedies for the material or moral damage in the event of unjust sentence or unlawful deprivation of liberty was based on the desire to avoid the conviction situation of the Romanian state by the international courts for failure to comply with the Art. 5 paragraph 5 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms that 'any individual who is the victim of arrest or detention in conditions contrary to the provisions of this article shall have the right for remedy".
Authors and Affiliations
ELIZA EMANUELA OPREA
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP162586
- DOI -
- Views 110
- Downloads 0
WITHDRAWAL OF PREVIOUS COMPLAINT. A COMPARISON OF THE OLD AND THE NEW CRIMINAL CODE. PROBLEMS OF COMPARATIVE LAW
In criminal law previous complaint has a double legal valence, material and procedural in nature, constituting a condition for criminal liability, but also a functional condition in cases expressly and limitatively provi...
UN SECRETARY- GENERAL'S FORMS OF INVOLVEMENT IN THE PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES. THE DIPLOMATIC MEANS
The United Nations Secretary- General is a symbol and an instrument of the peaceful settlement of international disputes, with a proven effectiveness in the prevention and resolution of conflicts, even in the most diffic...
RIGHTS CONTENT ON DESIGNS
Our intellect characterizes us and helps us make a difference in life. Due to our intellect we can understand the world around us, our personality is shaped and developed and, depending on such development, we can learn...
INVOLVEMENT OF LANGUAGE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF NUMERICAL REPRESENTIATION AR PRESCHOOL CHILDREN
In recent years, one of the questions that developmental psychology has tried to answer is related to the origin and how our cognitive system development. A significant impact on trying to find an answer to this question...
THE STIPULATION FOR ANOTHER IN THE ROMANIAN CIVIL CODE
The article focuses on the stipulation for another in the context of the Romanian Civil code. Its purpose is to answer a few questions, such as: is the stipulation for another still a true exception from the relativity e...