The reinterpretation of the Hegelian philosophy of nature by Alexandre Kojève. The theory of primacy
Journal Title: Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy - Year 2010, Vol 2, Issue 1
Abstract
According to Kojève, all philosophical thought develops systematically. Thus, when reading Hegel, he could not go over the text without reflecting on the delicate status of the Philosophy of nature. As opposed to ordinary readings, he defends its necessity and truth, in spite of the outdated statements present in this work. Hegel is right to make a radical distinction between the philosophy of nature and the mathematics – i.e. science – of nature. Kojevian thought draws on a reflection on different forms of language. It especially opposes philosophical conceptual discourse to scientific measure. However, he is also interested in the objects of discourse or measure. He establishes the existence of three objects of phenomenological discourse: minerals, human beings and men that are characterized by the primacy of present, past and future.
Authors and Affiliations
Slim Charfeddine
Plato: Philosophy as Politics
One of the elements that obstruct the access to a presumed meaning of Plato’s doctrine is the use of the conventional meaning of the term “philosophia”, that is the signification that has prevailed after Aristotle. In or...
From a Non-Formal Ethics of Values in Scheler to the Thresholds Zones in Waldenfels: Ethical Implications of the Understanding of Personality
This research intends to develop the ethical implications of the concept of personality through the phenomenological approaches of Scheler and Waldenfels. For both philosophers, an ethics based on a moral formalism would...
Whose Hume Is This?
Jeffrey A. Bell, Deleuze’s Hume. Philosophy, Culture and Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009
The Curse of the Righter of Wrongs, the Goat and the Prophet: Elements for a Theory of the Theologico-Political Ways of Subjectivation
This paper reflects on the relation between psychiatric institutions and political thought. Starting from the distinction made by G. de Clérambault between interpretation and passionate deliria, we aim at identifying two...