The Relationship between Service Quality Dimensions and Brand Equity: Higher Education Students’ Perceptions

Abstract

Purpose: Since the higher education environment has become highly competitive, the application of marketing principles to the education environment becomes increasingly evident. In order to attract new students and continue business, the institutional brand also gains on importance. Considering the scant literature on the influence of the perceptions of service quality dimensions on brand equity in general and higher education in particular, this exploratory study seeks to determine whether the SERVPERF dimensions of service quality make significant influencers of the overall brand equity of select (South African) universities, and whether the overall service quality significantly influences the overall brand equity.<br/><br/>Design: The authors conducted a survey among a judgmental sample of 400 students from two selected university campuses, using the SERVPERF scale. The data were analyzed with inferential statistical methods, such as multiple regression analysis, with the help of SPSS.<br/><br/>Findings: Tangibles and Empathy were significant and positive influencers of the students’ perception of the institutions’ overall brand equity and the overall service quality as a significant predictor of the overall brand equity. It also became evident that the overall service quality has a significant and positive influence on the overall brand equity when it comes to the students’ perceptions of the surveyed universities.<br/><br/>Implications: Tangibles and Empathy must be closely monitored and carefully managed, while the important role that service quality plays in the overall sense in increasing brand equity perceptions implies that – in the branding efforts of higher education institutions – management and leadership should pay particular attention to offering high levels of service quality to increase the value of their brands.<br/><br/>Research limitations: Only two campuses from one public higher education institution in South Africa was included in the survey, thus any generalization of the research findings must be circumspect.<br/><br/>Originality/value: Management and leadership of higher education institutions must know the service quality dimensions which promote the brand of the institution and manage them to promote a positive image of the institution since these are the dimensions of quality emphasized by the students.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Sanjay Soni, Krishna Govender

Keywords

Related Articles

Increasing the disclosure of information to shareholders regarding risk management

The financial crisis of 2007 is often seen as a result of lax risk management on the part of financial institutions. The ensuing regulatory discussion has lead to new rules being developed in the USA and the UK that enha...

Relacje pomiędzy życiem zawodowym a rodzinnym pracownika i ich wpływ na funkcjonowanie przedsiębiorstwa

W świecie biznesu narasta konflikt między rolą społeczną członka rodziny, dbającego o zaspokajanie potrzeb swoich najbliższych, a rolą pracownika, mocno zaangażowanego w realizację celów zawodowych. Tylko pozornie temat...

Co-operative Management Report: before, during and after a crisis

In line with the presented main goal and its respective aims, the report describes the managementof co-operatives and also the organizational frames as well as the legal and formal regulationsof co-operatives. The report...

Etyka biznesu: nauczanie i uczenie się

CelRekapitulacja doświadczeń edukacyjnych w zakresie etyki biznesu oraz przedstawienie zagrożeń i szans związanych z edukacją etyczną na poziomie akademickim oraz zawodowym.MetodologiaOpis uzupełniony pogłębioną analizą...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP399513
  • DOI 10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.236
  • Views 171
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sanjay Soni, Krishna Govender (2018). The Relationship between Service Quality Dimensions and Brand Equity: Higher Education Students’ Perceptions. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 26(3), 71-87. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-399513