The role of ultrasound imaging at detecting aortic aneurysm in emergency department
Journal Title: The European Research Journal - Year 2019, Vol 5, Issue 4
Abstract
Objective: Our study was carried out to investigate the effects of focused ultrasound imaging which is performed by emergency physicians in diagnosis and duration of treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods: The patients over 50 years; who applied to Uludağ University Emergency Department with the complaints of abdominal pain, side pain, chest pain, syncope, unexplained hypotension and under suspicion of the abdominal aortic aneurysm, were included in the study. Bedside ultrasound for abdominal aorta was done and diameter measurements of aorta recorded in order to determine the presence of an abdominal aortic aneurysm or to exclude the diagnosis. Results: A total of 133 patients were included in the study. Eight patients were excluded from the study because of inadequate bedside US imaging. The aortic diameter was measured as ≥ 3 cm in the 54 (43.2%) patients. The aortic diameter was found more than 5 cm in 8 (6.4%) patients. After ultrasonographic investigations, aneurysm rupture (n = 5; 4%), aortic dissction (n = 13; 10.4%) and aortic aneurysm (n = 36; 28.8%) were detected. The diagnosis was confirmed with computed tomography in all patients who had aortic pathology. Because of the continuance of clinic suspects in the patients whose aortic diameters were less than 3 cm, their computed tomography images were obtained and their aortic diameters were found within normal limits. Further imaging studies weren’t performed at the remaining 48 (38.4%) patients because different prediagnosis was considered. Emergency ultrasound had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 87-100), a specificity of 91% (95% CI: 90.8-99.8). Conclusions: The diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms is omitted 30% in emergency departments. It has a high morbidity and mortality if the diagnosis is skipped. In the presence of aortic aneurysm suspicion, evaluation of aortic diameter by bedside ultrasound is diagnostic. Bedside ultrasound evaluation by emergency physicians should become routine for using time and investigation numbers properly.
Authors and Affiliations
Suna Eraybar, Şule Akköse Aydın, Meral Leman Özkan, Serhat Atmaca, Yasemin Nennicioğlu
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP607685
- DOI 10.18621/eurj.402076
- Views 77
- Downloads 0
Dental students’ perceptions on preclinical restorative dentistry course: Biruni University case
Objectives. The student’s perspectives of their restorative dentistry education would be an important source of information for evaluation of preclinical curriculum. Thus, the aim of the present research was to obtain in...
Analysis of the cornea donor data: an eye bank study
Objectives. To analyse 1.5-year data of our newly established eye bank and to evaluate the factors affecting donor quality. Methods. Our bank’s donor cornea data between July 2013 and November 2014 were retrospectively a...
Management of constipation in preventing urinary tract infections in children: a concise review
Objectives: Constipation is a common problem in children. Chronic functional constipation (CFC) has been a claimed conditions that may increase the risk for urinary tract infections (UTIs). Dysfunctional voiding (DV) and...
Cardiac myxomas: an analysis of 39 patients
Objectives. Myxomas are the most common benign primary heart tumors. They have serious complications including intracardiac blood flow obstruction and embolic events. The aim of the study was to assess our experiences re...
Re-expansion pulmonary edema after pleurocan catheterization: a case report
Re-expansion pulmonary edema (RPE) is a rare but potentially hazardous complication following evacuation of the pleural region. Symptomatic RPE occurs in less than 1% of patients after pleural drainage. Early diagnosis a...