THE SEPARATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL FUNCTIONS

Journal Title: Administratīvā un kriminālā justīcija - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 80

Abstract

The term criminal procedural function has historically been used by scientists. In order to identify primary issues in procedural functions, the competition principle was analyzed. This strengthened such important issues as separation of prosecution and court functions, parties’ equality, independence of courts etc. Therefore, the concept of three concept functions – prosecution, defence and adjudication – was developed in criminal proceedings.  In the context of the Criminal Procedure Law having taking effect, this term was included into the law, including the principle of separation of criminal procedural functions.The aim of this paper is to offer the insight into interpretation of the concept of the criminal procedural function with the special focus on specific issues in function separation. Section 17 of Criminal Procedure Law determines the function of control of restrictions of human rights in a pre-trail. The functions of prosecution, defence and adjudication do not determine their priority over all other criminal procedural functions. These functions are claimed to be separate and therefore cannot be applied to the same person.

Authors and Affiliations

Sandra Kaija

Keywords

Related Articles

THE FACTORS INFLUENCING SAFETY OF PENAL CORRECTION SYSTEM

In article the general and special factors exerting impact on safety of a penal correction system are considered (Further – penal correction system). Relying on the different points of view stated in science, results of...

DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL REGULATION FOR DRONE AS UNMANNED AIRCRAFT IN LATVIA

In this article the author examines existing and seldom researched issues regarding the legal framework for regulating unmanned aircraft flights, focussing particularly on drone flights. The purpose of the article is to...

FORENSIC HUMAN HAIR EXAMINATION

This article reviews the examination of hair and its role in forensic area. The forensic examination of hair is a well-established discipline and had been so for two centuries. Examination is largely based on microscopy,...

A SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO OTHER INTERESTS AS A CRITERION FOR SUBSTANTIAL HARM AT CRIMINAL LAW

The aim of the article “A significant threat to other interests as a criterion for substantial harm at criminal law” is to examine the problems of understanding the concept of “substantial harm” in criminal law; to analy...

RAIDERISM IN LATVIA: ITS CIVIL AND CRIMINAL ASPECTS

Raiderism is a type of offense that doesn’t have an exact definition in the law system. Author in his publication on the basis of traditional and non-standard raiderism in the country, analyzes the raiderism direction of...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP660183
  • DOI 10.17770/acj.v3i80.2785
  • Views 140
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sandra Kaija (2017). THE SEPARATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL FUNCTIONS. Administratīvā un kriminālā justīcija, 3(80), 32-38. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-660183