THE SEPARATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL FUNCTIONS

Journal Title: Administratīvā un kriminālā justīcija - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 80

Abstract

The term criminal procedural function has historically been used by scientists. In order to identify primary issues in procedural functions, the competition principle was analyzed. This strengthened such important issues as separation of prosecution and court functions, parties’ equality, independence of courts etc. Therefore, the concept of three concept functions – prosecution, defence and adjudication – was developed in criminal proceedings.  In the context of the Criminal Procedure Law having taking effect, this term was included into the law, including the principle of separation of criminal procedural functions.The aim of this paper is to offer the insight into interpretation of the concept of the criminal procedural function with the special focus on specific issues in function separation. Section 17 of Criminal Procedure Law determines the function of control of restrictions of human rights in a pre-trail. The functions of prosecution, defence and adjudication do not determine their priority over all other criminal procedural functions. These functions are claimed to be separate and therefore cannot be applied to the same person.

Authors and Affiliations

Sandra Kaija

Keywords

Related Articles

AMENDMENT OF THE CASE-LAW OF COURTS IN BULGARIA ON ADMINISTRATIVE CASES AS A CONSEQUENCE OF A RESOLUTION ON ART. 6 OF EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS

Cilvēktiesību ievērošana saskaņā ar Eiropas Cilvēktiesību konvenciju ir viens no svarīgākajiem Eiropas Savienības kopējās politikas veidošanas un pakāpeniskas attīstības priekšnoteikumiem. Minētā prioritāte ir iespējama...

PROCEEDING OF SOLDIER MILITARY DISCIPLINE OFFENSE

The article, based on the theoretical and practical analysis of military discipline infringement proceedings the military, identified the shortcomings of the legal framework in Latvia, when the rules allows an interested...

THE RELEVANT ISSUES OF CARRYING OUT THE INVESTIGATIVE ACTION – ON-SITE EXAMINATION OF TESTIMONY – IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF LATVIA

One of the priorities in the activity of law enforcement establishments of Latvia is the qualitative investigation of crimes. The persons, directing the process, the investigators, prosecutors, judges constantly improve...

NEWLY DISCLOSED CIRCUMSTANCES – GROUNDS FOR RENEWAL OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDING

It is presumed that no appeal may lie from a judgment that has already entered into legal force and such a judgment is regarded as final in a case, criminal proceedings may still be reopened under certain legal circumsta...

COUNTERACTION TO ILLEGAL MIGRATION IN THE ACTIVITIES OF THE UKRAINE’S STATE BORDER SERVICE

The article is devoted to the scientific review of counteraction to illegal migration by the State Border Service of Ukraine. The features of the theoretical aspects of illegal migration are analyzed. The statistics of a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP660183
  • DOI 10.17770/acj.v3i80.2785
  • Views 153
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sandra Kaija (2017). THE SEPARATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL FUNCTIONS. Administratīvā un kriminālā justīcija, 3(80), 32-38. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-660183