THE SIZE AND THE IMPORTANCE OF THE EVIDENCE GOVERNED DURING THE PROSECUTION IN REM
Journal Title: Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ) - Year 2019, Vol 11, Issue 13
Abstract
The jurisdiction developed on the edge of the implementation of the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, relating to the verification of the legality of the referral to the court, the legality of the management of evidences and documents of the prosecution, has proved the fact that in front of the judges of preliminary chamber has come, not infrequently, the request of the exclusion of the evidences governed during the criminal prosecution in rem, on the ground that these evidences have been managed either in total or in the majority of them, at this stage absolutely secret of the criminal prosecution, even though the offender of the deed was known and in this way, the future suspect or charged, has been deprived of any realistic and concrete possibility to defend himself, to assist with the help of a lawyer in the management of theses evidences and to combat them by appropriate procedural means. This raises the question which is the size of the evidences that reasonably can be taken during the criminal proceedings in rem, thus the suspect/ defendant should not be harmed in his procedural rights, in particular with regard to his right of defence. To search for an answer to this matter, this is very present in the proceedings in front of the judge of preliminary chamber, legal provisions must be primarily examined that implicitly separates the criminal prosecution in rem from the moment of further performing of the prosecution towards a certain person.
Authors and Affiliations
Alin Sorin NICOLESCU, Luminița CRISTIU-NINU
NEW TYPES OF TRADEMARKS – PROTECTION OF MULTIMEDIA TRADEMARKS
The Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trademarks.and the Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliam...
COMPENSATORY ACTION - A NEW LEGISLATIVE ACTION IMPOSED ON NATIONAL AUTHORITIES AS CONSEQUENCE OF RECENT CASE-LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Subsequent to pronouncement by the European Court of Human Rights of the semi-pilot judgement in case Iacov Stanciu v. Romania and the pilot judgement in case Rezmiveş and Others v. Romania - where the Court found struct...
EXTERNAL TRADE OF ROMANIA – TEN YEARS AFTER EU ACCESION (2007-2016)
Advantages of the EU single market and the costs related to adaptation the Community context and requirements, the impact of the international economic and financial crisis and the difficulties in accessing EU Structural...
UNLAWFUL CONDUCT ON THE CAPITAL MARKET
European Union Law had explicitly authorized the use of a double punishment (administrative and criminal) in the context of the fight against illegal conduct on the financial markets. Thus many facts and behaviours on th...
CHALLENGES OF THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY: EXPLORING THE CASE OF QATAR
Qatar’s Permanent Constitution and National Vision 2030 constituted the turning point in Qatar’s transition towards knowledge society. Articles 22-49 of Qatar’s Permanent Constitution together with the 4 pillars of Qatar...