The usage of the official name of the state (justice sphere)

Journal Title: Адміністративне право і процес - Year 2016, Vol 1, Issue

Abstract

The article attempts to analyze the basic forms and methods of the usage of the offi- cial name of the state in the justice sphere. Special attention is paid to the peculiari- ties of domestic and foreign practice of constitutional and legal regulations of the or- der of usage of the official name of the state in adopting judicial decisions. It is noted that justice historically has belonged to traditional areas of the usage of the official name of the state, since justice as such was often administered and court decisions were adopted in its very name. Relevant constitutional provisions, direct statement of which is often caused by peculiarities of national political and legal traditions is in its basis. For modern constitutional states with the republican form of government, in democratic states a priori "the adoption of the judicial decisions in the name of Republic" is proposed to consider as synonymous to "adopting judicial decisions in the name of the people". Both provisions have been traditionally applied in the long-standing European constitutional and legal practice. The constitutional provision of paragraph five of Article 124 of the current Fundamental Law of Ukraine, according to which "Judicial decisions shall be ad- opted in the name of Ukraine" is well in tune with the established European consti- tutional and legal practice and generally meets the national traditions in the field of justice (Ukrainian People’s Republic, West-Ukrainian People’s Republic, the 1995 Constitutional Treaty). Attention is drawn to the fact that in the above provision of Article 124.5 of the Constitution of Ukraine the phrase "judicial decisions" is used without any reservations, and it applies to any and all acts of the court, which are called "judgments". Yet, later the legislator determined that only those "judgments by which the court proceedings are terminated, shall be adopted in the name of Ukraine" (Article 13.1 of the Law of Ukraine "On the Judicial System and Status of Judges"). Changes were made to the procedural codes in a similar way, and explanations were given by the Plenums of the Supreme Court of Ukraine and high specialised courts concerning which "judgments" should be adopted in the name of Ukraine. In fact, all court decisions were divided into those adopted in the name of Ukraine and all other (not adopted in the name of Ukraine). All this contributed to the emergence of incon- sistent application of Article 124.5 of the Constitution of Ukraine. Conclusion is made about the need to review the domestic practice of adoption of spe- cific "judgments" by courts of different jurisdictions both "in the name of Ukraine", and without the use of the latter. Herewith, decisive in this matter is strict compliance with Article 124.5 of the Constitution of Ukraine, according to which "judicial deci- sions shall be adopted by courts in the name of Ukraine".

Authors and Affiliations

Kh. P. Stetsiuk

Keywords

Related Articles

FEATURES OF BRINGING TO ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY FOR TAX OFFENSES

In this article, the author presents and analyzes the most typical problems that arise in practice in the process of bringing persons to administrative responsibility for tax offenses. A special emphasis is put on real c...

Administrative Police in the French Republic

This article is devoted to the research of administrative police organization in the system of state authorities of the French Republic, and also to the research of issues concerning the provisions of public order, as...

DER ZUGANG ZUM (VERWALTUNGS-) GERICHT ZU DEN BESCHWERDEVORAUSSETZUNGEN IM ISTERREICHISCHEN VERWALTUNGSPROZESS

Zweck. Der Aufsatz erörtert die wichtigsten formalen Voraussetzungen für die Erhebung eines Rechtsmittels gegen den Bescheid einer Verwaltungsbehörde im österreichischen Verwaltungsprozessrecht. Methoden. Ausgehend von d...

ON THE ISSUE OF THE FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE IN THE GRAND DUKES OF LITHUANIA STATE AND LEGAL POLICIES IN THE XIII – XIV CENTURIES

The article is devoted to the unique for the feudal period policy of religious tolerance led by the Grand Dukes of Lithuania at the territories under their rule. Grand Dukes of Lithuania is usually identified as “pagan s...

A COMPARATIVE LOOK AT TAX AVOIDANCE AND IT’S DISTINCTION FROM TAX SAVING AND TAX PLANNING IN CONTINENTAL AND COMMON LAW SYSTEM

Tax avoidance is one of methods of tax burden reduction. It is connected with the choice for achieving specific economic purposes of such civil law transaction which differs from the one usually taken in such circumstanc...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP440141
  • DOI -
  • Views 66
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kh. P. Stetsiuk (2016). The usage of the official name of the state (justice sphere). Адміністративне право і процес, 1(), 206-215. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-440141