Theories and hypotheses on the formation of the Gagauz people

Abstract

The scientific debate over the Gagauz subject remains an intense one, continuing to represent a controversial matter. Historians, anthropologists, linguists, etc of different ethnic backgrounds themselves have concentrated their attention on this scientific endeavour. There are currently over 20 theories on the matter of this small Turkic people`s origins. The most prominent ones refer to an Oghuz or Seljuk origin, but it is also possible that the Gagauz came to be within a mixture of different peoples. But leaving origins aside, historical sources show the important impact that the Gagauz have had in the history of Dobrudja. It seems this south-eastern region in current-day Romania was where the ethno-genesis of the Gagauz completed itself.

Authors and Affiliations

Stefan BEJAN

Keywords

Related Articles

 The Nuclear power of France. Its impact on International Relations

 The 20th century involved, among others, significant research into the realm of weapons of mass destruction. France, wanting to take front stage, joined the nuclear club in 1960. The tests for creating the “perfect...

Daily life in Budjak during the First World War

During the First World War, Southern Bessarabia was in close proximity to the war zone. This led to drastic changes in the way of life of the local population. Substantial restrictions were imposed on a number of spheres...

 The acceptance of dowry in historical judiciary sources that have circulated in the Romanian Principalities. Dowry lists

 : Giving a dowry to girls when they got married was in the medieval period one of the major worries of parents, regardless of the social class that they belonged to. Often the source of misunderstandings and family...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP217105
  • DOI -
  • Views 85
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Stefan BEJAN (2017). Theories and hypotheses on the formation of the Gagauz people. STUDIUM - Revista studenţilor, masteranzilor şi doctoranzilor în istorie, 10(10), 117-127. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-217105