Theory of Social Understanding of Statutes; Principles, Application
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2012, Vol 44, Issue 90
Abstract
The theory of Muḥammad Jawād Mughniya entitled “social understanding of statutes”, is the evolved mechanism for the refinement of the basis of a ruling (tanqīḥ-i manāṭ) in legal reasoning (ijtihād) process, which has been developed according to such principles and criteria as objectives of sharī‘a, convention, and contextual manifestation. Heeding the objectives of sharī‘a, in view of the temporal and spatial elements, creates a type of definite proportion between the subject and the ordinance and maintains a manifestation for the context of the lawmaker’s speech, which will be valid on the basis of the rational principle of the authority of manifestation. The modern conventional understanding of the subject mentioned in the context of traditions annuls the specification and provides the jurisprudent with the chance to interpret and expand the subject and manage to discover the primary ordinances about it. The theory of “social understanding of statutes” applies to that category of legal ordinances that are both devised on the basis of social interests of human beings rather than their human nature and the lack of evidence denoting the non-interpretation of statute. Thus, devotional ordinances lie outside the limits of this rule and the theory is executable in social and transactional issues within its conditions. One of the most important outcomes of this theory is that the existing statutes and traditions have the capacity to be issued for most of the new subjects, just like the primary ordinance, without falling into the maelstrom of analogy or appealing too much to the secondary topics; an outcome that, according to Shahīd Ṣadr, unravels a great complication in jurisprudence.
Authors and Affiliations
Elham Eskandari, ʿAlī Tavallāʾī
A Juridical-Legal Inquiry into ‘Aḍl in the Marriage of the Grown-up Virgin
To prevent the consequences of inexperience and prevalence of fervor resulting from emotions and sentiments in a young girl who is unfamiliar with marital affairs, the legislator has deemed as necessary the permission [f...
An Introduction to the Quiddity of the Attitude of the Intellectuals and its Relation to Intellectual Judgment
The present article is a new attempt in elucidating the quiddity of the attitude (sīra) of the intellectuals and its relation to the rational judgment, which is discussed on two main bases. The first basis is dedicated t...
Possibility of Qiṣāṣ (Retaliated Punishment) of Father by the Child in Legal Opinions and Penal Laws
The impossibility of qiṣāṣ of father for murdering the child is unanimously agreed upon by the Imāmī jursprudents; however, presuming that the father does not directly commit murder of the child and the child inherits th...
A Legal-Judicial Study of the Nature of Publication Contract
Today, the issue concerning the conferment of the whole or a part of the material rights belonging to the author and the related contracts is of special importance, to the extent that in some legal systems, such as the F...
Legal-Judicial Study of the Verdict on Multiple Crimes resulting from a Single Strike
In case multiple crimes are caused by a single strike, there are three different beliefs concerning the ruling on this issue. The renowned majority of jurists have deemed as necessary the payment of blood money (diya) by...