Third Law of Motion: Revisited and Generalized

Abstract

Descartes third law of motion has preceded Newton‟s third law of motion. Both the laws appear to explain similar observations. Third law is critically analysed in view of definition and elaboration given by Newton at page 20 of the Principia. It is evident that law is incompletely studied. Newton did not give any mathematical equation for the law. The definition and explanation of the law is completely analyzed theoretically and discussed in view of the experimental data. Depending upon the action, the reaction is result of interactions between various bodies having different characteristics. Thus action and reaction may not be equal in all cases. Newton‟s explanation is simply qualitative, not quantitative which is required for scientific analysis. The law is universally applicable to all cases and all bodies without any constraint. However Newton elaborated the same in terms of just three qualitative examples which is not scientific. The terms action and reaction neither possess units nor dimensions, even expressed in terms of equations the explanation is qualitative only. The law is understood in terms of force only. However Newton expressed law in terms of both force and velocity in three examples. If law is expressed in terms of force and velocity analogous to action and reaction, then its limitations are evident. For example it does not account for the significant factors e.g. inherent characteristics, nature, compositions, flexibility, rigidity, magnitude, size, elasticity, shape , distinctiveness of interacting bodies, mode of interactions, point of impact etc. The law is universally applicable for all bodies e.g. bodies may be of steel, wood, rubber, cloth, wool, sponge, spring, typical plastic, porous material, air / fluid filled artifact, mud or kneaded flour or chewing gum specifically fabricated material etc. For all such bodies if the action is same, then the reaction must be the same. But it is not found true in all cases, as interaction between rubber and steel are different from rubber and cotton. In the third law the law of conservation of energy is obeyed, and energy is converted in various forms. Thus law is generalized; reaction is proportional to action depending upon characteristics of system. Mathematically, Reaction = -K action, the value of K may be equal to, less than, or greater than unity depending upon experimental parameters.

Authors and Affiliations

Ajay Sharma

Keywords

Related Articles

Intelligent controlled UPQC for power quality improvement of grid supply connected with non-linear load

The issue of power quality has gained popularity in the recent years because of the widespread use of power electronic devices, larger inter-connected load networks and widespread use of non-conventional source of electr...

Determination of the Optimal Path in Taxiways at Airports via the Probability Method

The problem of flights delay has been addressed in this article. A new program to help the air controller has been implemented. The main objective is to improve the airport performance ability to receive more aircrafts d...

Analysis of Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard [PCI DSS] Compliance by Confluence of COBIT 5 Framework

The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) aims to enhance the security of cardholder data and is required when cardholder data or authentication data are stored, processed or transmitted. The implementat...

A Novel Approach To Understand The Spatial And Temporal Pattern Of Shifting Cultivation Fields Using GIS Techniques In Longding Division Of Arunachal Pradesh, India

Shifting cultivation, locally known as jhum, is one of the dominant traditional land use system practiced in the uplands of the hilly states of the northeastern region of India, but there is lack of information on the sp...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP392860
  • DOI 10.9790/9622-0711047795.
  • Views 91
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ajay Sharma (2017). Third Law of Motion: Revisited and Generalized. International Journal of engineering Research and Applications, 7(11), 77-95. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-392860