THREE PORT VERSUS FOUR PORT CHOLECYSTECTOMY- A RETROSPECTIVE DESCRIPTIVE STUDY

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2018, Vol 7, Issue 10

Abstract

BACKGROUND Various modifications have been tried in laparoscopic cholecystectomy since its introduction. One, two and three port LC have been performed on limited scale. Our aim was to compare three port LC with four port LC in patients with cholelithiasis. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of 3 port LC for treatment of cholelithiasis by comparing the result with 4 port LC with respect to safety and efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this comparative study, a total of 150 patients of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gall stone disease were studied by dividing them into two groups. The results were compared in terms of complications, conversion from 3 port to 4 port and from LC to open procedure, hospital stay, pain score, operative time, need of analgesia and bile duct injury. RESULTS A total of 150 patients of cholelithiasis were treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Three port LC was performed in 60 (40%) patients and 4 port LC was performed in 90 (60%) patients. In group 1, 44.4% patients complained of mild pain and 55.5% experienced moderate-to-severe pain on VAS post-operatively, while in group 2 70% patients complained of mild pain and 30% patients complained of moderate-to-severe pain post-operatively. There was no bile duct injury reported in either group. However, in group 2 (3 port LC) 3 cases (5%) converted to 4 port LC and there was no conversion (open) reported in group 1 (4 port LC). CONCLUSION In this comparative study, we found that use of 3 port LC did not affect the procedure safety, conversion rate, operating time and complication rate. Three port LC is routine in our institute and used by experienced surgeons, needed fewer painkillers, shorter hospital stay and more cost effective.

Authors and Affiliations

Mahesh Chandra Pandey, Mishra S. P, Nagar H. S, Rawat H. S, Shrivastava R. K

Keywords

Related Articles

THYROTOXICOSIS HYPOKALAEMIC PERIODIC PARALYSIS WITH ACQUIRED BARTTER-LIKE PHENOTYPE

PRESENTATION OF CASE A Hindu male patient aged about forty years admitted to the medicine ward due to weakness in both proximal and distal muscles of both the limbs since last 10 days. Subsequently, he was unable to move...

 ASSESSMENT OF CLINICO-RADIOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF OPERATED CASES OF INTRA: ARTICULAR LOWER END RADIUS FRACTURES

 [b] BACKGROUND[/b]: Distal radius fractures with intra-articular extension are complex injuries which have been treated by various methods. The study was to evaluate the outcome of operative management of dist...

 EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAMMED DEEP BREATHING EXERCISES ON REDUCING THE LEVEL OF FATIGUE DURING EXTERNAL RADIATION THERAPY

 CONTEXT Cancer related fatigue is the most common symptom described by cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. AIM To assess the effectiveness of programmed deep breathing exercises on reducing the level of...

THE BACTERIAL PROFILE AND ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERN OF URINARY ISOLATES IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN WESTERN U.P.

BACKGROUND Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the common infections in the Indian community. Distribution and susceptibility of UTIcausing pathogens change according to time and place. UTI is one of the most common...

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BODY MASS INDEX (BMI), BODY FAT PERCENTAGE AND PULMONARY FUNCTIONS IN OBESE, OVERWEIGHT AND NORMAL WEIGHT ADOLESCENTS

BACKGROUND Abdominal obesity may influence the lung function through a mechanism that restricts descent of diaphragm and limits lung expansion compared to overall adiposity, which may compress the chest wall. Multiple me...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP411263
  • DOI 10.14260/jemds/2018/269
  • Views 63
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mahesh Chandra Pandey, Mishra S. P, Nagar H. S, Rawat H. S, Shrivastava R. K (2018). THREE PORT VERSUS FOUR PORT CHOLECYSTECTOMY- A RETROSPECTIVE DESCRIPTIVE STUDY. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 7(10), 1178-1181. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-411263