To Compare The Effect Of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Static Stretching on Flexibility of Hamstring Muscle: A Comparative Study

Abstract

Background: Flexibility is an important physiological component of physical fitness and reduced flexibility can cause inefficiency in the workplace and is also a risk factor for low back pain. Increasing hamstring flexibility was reported to be an effective method for increasing hamstring muscle performance.Objective: To compare the effects of modified hold-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching technique and static stretching on flexibility of hamstring muscle.Materials and Methods: In this comparative study 60 subjects were selected by convenience sampling and research design was comparative and experiment in nature. Subjects were selected on the basis of inclusion criteria. Subjects were divided into two groups, group A and group B allocating alternate subjects to group A and group B, 30 in each group. Group A was treated with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with cryotherapy and Group B was treated with Static Stretching with cryotherapy. Baseline assessment was taken on pre stretch, post stretch and after 24 hours using Active Knee Extension test and Modified back saver sit and reach test.Results: Both the groups showed significant improvement in hamstring flexibility. (p0.05).Conclusion: Thus we concluded that the Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching Technique and Static Stretching both are effective to improve flexibility of hamstring muscle and clinically both the interventions are equally effective. Tanu Kapila | Dilpreet Kaur | Jaspinder Kaur"To Compare The Effect Of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Static Stretching on Flexibility of Hamstring Muscle: A Comparative Study" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-1 | Issue-5 , August 2017, URL: http://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd2266.pdf http://www.ijtsrd.com/other-scientific-research-area/other/2266/to-compare-the-effect-of-proprioceptive-neuromuscular-facilitation-and-static-stretching-on-flexibility-of-hamstring-muscle-a-comparative-study/tanu-kapila

Authors and Affiliations

Keywords

Related Articles

Long Term Effect of INM on Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Rice-Rice Cropping System in North Konkan

Present investigation is a part of long term experiment which was started in 1986 87 at Model Agronomic Experimental Farm, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Karjat, Dist. Raigad, Maharashtra 18.920 N latitude, 73.3...

Evaluation of Porosity in Fusion Welded AA2014 Plates using X Ray Radiography

NDT has evolved as an essential demand in much modern engineering design in aircraft applications. The performance levels and reliability of the NDE is more important to the end use of the object being inspected. Failure...

Base Isolation Retrofitting Design for the Existing 9 Story Large Panel Apartment Building

In Armenia seismic isolation of existing buildings is becoming a more common method of providing protection from earthquake damage. Thanks to the works of the author of this paper in nowadays Armenia is well known as a c...

Rumour Source Identification in Network

Identification of rumour sources in a network plays a critical role in limiting the damage caused by them through the timely quarantine of the sources. However, the temporal variation in the topology of networks and the...

Developing Long-Term Business Performance through Supplier Network and Company Capability

This study is an exploratory study on small companies to investigate and explain how SMEs in Surabaya build supplier networks and enhance dynamic capabilities. This study is important due to not many studies explaining h...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP357982
  • DOI -
  • Views 139
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

(2017). To Compare The Effect Of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Static Stretching on Flexibility of Hamstring Muscle: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 1(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-357982