To Compare the Efficacy of Conservative Management with Surgery for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomised Prospective Cohort Study

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 5

Abstract

Background: Low back pain is a common medical problem in general population with high morbidity and healthcare costs. The optimal management strategy, including the role of surgical intervention, remains controversial. We conducted a randomized prospective cohort study to compare the efficacy of surgery and conservative management for chronic low back pain. Materials and Methods: This randomized prospective cohort study was conducted on 130 patients with low back pain. Patients were divided randomly into Group I (Conservative management) and Group II (surgical management). Follow up of patients was done at intervals of 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months and then 6 month, 1 year and 2 years. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used for assessment of pain for all patients. Modified Mc Nab Scale was used as post operative/management tool to assess intensity of low back pain and quality of life. Results: There was a gradual decline in VAS score for Group 1 till follow up whereas an early and sharp decrease in VAS scorewas seen for Group II till 3 months after which it increased on an average till last follow up. Mac Nab scale showed gradual improvement in condition of patients over a period of time for Group I with more patients showing improvement by 1 year. Mc Nab scale showed good results starting within first week only up to 3 months for Group II. Later there was some deterioration/static scores in group 2 perticularly, and patients were almost in same state at 2 years of follow up for both the groups. Conclusion: A gradual improvement in condition occurs by conservative management for chronic low back pain. Surgical management provides immediate good results but in some patients pain relief may not last for long period. More studies comparing the two treatment options can give better insight into the selection of treatment option for the patients with chronic low back pain and may validate our results.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr Kuldeep Yadav

Keywords

Related Articles

A Rare Case of Intradural Extramedullary Myxopapillary Ependymoma At Thoracolumbar Junction

A 29 year male with chronic low back pain with bilateral lower limbs paraesthesia presented in OPD. After evaluation with MRI Thoraco-Lumbar Spine found to have T12-L1 level IDEM mass compressing cauda equina? Schwanoma....

A Comparative study of Topical Besifloxacin Vs. Moxifloxacin in Management of Bacterial Keratitis

This comprehensive review summarises the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% against moxifloxacin 0.3% solution and examines its role in the treatment of ocular surface bacte...

Effectiveness of Epley’s Manoeuvre in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo- A Prospective Study

Introduction: Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) is one of the most common causes of vertigo. The patient complains of brief but severe episodes of rotatory vertigo lasting less than a minute upon sudden changes...

Glycaemic variability and Mortality in critically ill patients

Critical illness is still a major part of burden on healthcare systems and comprises about 7.6% of total in-hospital admissions1 . Critically ill patients have different glucose metabolism due to stress related condition...

Department of General Surgery, Thanjavur Medical College Hospital

Background: Peptic ulcer disease had a tremendous effect on morbidity and mortality until the last decades of the 20th century when epidemiological trends started to point to an impressive fall in its incidence. The pres...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP493876
  • DOI -
  • Views 59
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr Kuldeep Yadav (2018). To Compare the Efficacy of Conservative Management with Surgery for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomised Prospective Cohort Study. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 6(5), 214-220. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-493876