To Head CT Scan or Not: The Clinical Quandary in Suspected Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; a Validation Study on Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule
Journal Title: Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine - Year 2018, Vol 2, Issue 3
Abstract
Introduction: The Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage rule (OSR) is a clinical decision tool identified for ruling out subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in those patient above 15 years of age who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute onset atraumatic headache. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to externally validate the OSR in a single national health service (NHS) setting in the UK and secondly, to compare it with our current practice without using a decision rule. Method: A retrospective review of computerized medical records was done for all patients registered with headaches from January to December 2016. The data were manually charted on a data sheet from individual patient records. Patients fulfilling the preset inclusion and exclusion criteria as per the OSR were enrolled in the analysis. According to the OSR, if patient had any of the 6 criteria enlisted (age > 40 years, neck stiffness/pain, witnessed loss of consciousness, onset during exertion, thunderclap headache, limited neck flexion on examination), further diagnostic decision was required. All patients were followed up for 6 months on the computer system as it gets highlighted if the patient is represented again to the ED or is deceased. Results: A total of 737 ED visits with acute headache were reviewed for potential eligibility. Out of these, 649 were estimated to be eligible. On excluding 485 patients that could not meet the predetermined inclusion criteria and 19 patients as per the exclusion criteria, 145 (19.7%) patients were included in the analysis. There were 5 cases of SAH, yielding an incidence of 3.4 % (95% CI 1.3 % – 8.3 %). The sensitivity for SAH was 100% (95% CI, 46.3 % - 100 %); specificity of 44.2 % (95% CI, 36 % - 53 %); positive predictive value of 6.02 % (95% CI 2.2 % - 14.1 %); and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 92.7 % - 100%). Conclusion: Although being poorly specific, the OSR is a highly sensitive, simple tool for ruling out SAH in alert patients with a headache in ED settings.
Authors and Affiliations
Abdul-Sajjad Pathan, Eleonora Chakarova, Aamir Tarique
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP378223
- DOI 10.22114/ajem.v0i0.73
- Views 143
- Downloads 0
Prof. Abdelouahab Bellou, MD, MSc, PhD; Director of Quality & Safety, Administration & Leadership, and International Emergency Medicine Fellowship, Harvard Medical School, USA
What is your current position? Professor of Therapeutics and Emergency Medicine, Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Past-President of the European Society for Emergency Medicine (EuSEM). D...
A 56-year-old Diabetic Man with Acute Epigastric Pain
KEY QUESTIONS: • What are the pathologic findings in figure 1? • What are the differential diagnoses? • What is the diagnosis? LEARNING POINTS: Pathologic findings There is air in the wall/lumen of the gallbladder seen a...
Analysis of Factors and Medical Errors Involved in Patient Complaints in a European Emergency Department
Introduction: Patients’ complaints from Emergency Departments (ED) are frequent and can be used as a quality assurance indicator. Objective: Factors contributing to patients’ complaints (PCs) in the emergency department...
An Epidemiologic Study on Emergency Department Mortality
Introduction: Epidemiologic evaluation generally starts with recording the raw data regarding mortality, and healthcare managers should have a national plan executed for this purpose. Objective: The present study was pl...
Educational Intervention Effect on Pain Management Quality in Emergency Department; a Clinical Audit
Introduction: Pain is a frequent complaint of patients who are referred to the emergency department (ED), which is ignored or mismanaged and, almost always, approached in terms of determining the cause of pain instead of...